Send us a text

The carbohydrate fear has dominated nutrition conversation for decades, leaving many of us questioning whether bread, rice, fruit, or potatoes will sabotage our health and physique goals. This deep-rooted myth – that carbs inherently cause fat gain – continues to drive confusion and unnecessary restriction among even the most educated health-conscious people.

Our exploration begins by tracing how this fear developed. In the 1980s and 90s, low-fat diets dominated the landscape. When results disappointed, the pendulum swung dramatically toward low-carb approaches like Atkins, South Beach, and eventually keto and carnivore diets. These programs often vilified insulin (the hormone released after carb consumption) as the primary culprit in fat storage – a dramatic oversimplification of complex human physiology.

The scientific evidence paints a very different picture. Multiple high-quality studies, including metabolic ward research where all variables are tightly controlled, consistently demonstrate that when calories are equated, there's no meaningful difference in fat loss between low-carb and low-fat approaches. Kevin Hall's landmark NIH research found minimal differences between dietary approaches when calories were controlled. His 2017 meta-analysis reviewing dozens of diets concluded that calories, not macronutrient ratios, drive fat loss. Similarly, long-term studies show no meaningful advantage to either approach for sustainable weight management.

While insulin does rise after carbohydrate consumption, it also increases after protein intake – yet nobody blames chicken breast for weight gain. Fat accumulation stems from consistent energy surplus, not from specific foods. This clarification helps explain why some of the leanest, most muscular athletes consume substantial carbohydrates while maintaining exceptional body composition.

That said, some individuals, particularly those with insulin resistance or significant cravings, may feel better with moderately reduced carbohydrate intake. However, carbs offer tremendous benefits when coming from whole, fiber-rich sources – fueling workouts and recovery, supporting hormonal health, improving sleep quality, and promoting gut health through fiber content.

Ready to break free from carb fear and build a more sustainable approach to nutrition? Focus on quality carbohydrates from fruits, vegetables, legumes and whole grains, use them strategically to fuel your activities, and remember that energy balance – not carb avoidance – remains the foundation of body composition management. Visit transformhealthcoach.com to discover how our evidence-based coaching can help you build lasting nutrition habits without unnecessary restriction.

Study References:

1. Hall, K. D., et al. (2015). Cell Metabolism
   
   
   
2. Hall, K. D. (2017). Gastroenterology
   
   
   
3. Johnston, B. C., et al. (2014). JAMA
   
   
   
4. Nordmann, A. J., et al. (2006). Archives of Internal Medicine
   
   

5. Freire, R. (2020). Nutrition Reviews

https://www.facebook.com/coachadamkelley/

Instagram: @coachadamkelley

www.transformedhealthcoach.com

Send us a text

Curious about whether skipping breakfast is a miracle fat-burning hack or just another passing trend? In this evidence-based episode, we cut through the noise surrounding intermittent fasting to reveal what science actually tells us about this popular eating pattern.

The truth might surprise you. Despite the countless social media posts portraying fasting as a metabolic miracle, high-quality research consistently shows that when calories are matched, intermittent fasting produces results virtually identical to traditional meal timing approaches. The real benefit? For many people, limiting their eating window naturally helps control total calorie intake – it's not that fasting triggers special fat-burning processes, but rather that it creates a structure that makes overconsumption harder.

We explore the fascinating psychology behind why fasting has gained such traction, examine five key scientific studies that reveal the truth about its effectiveness, and break down exactly when this approach might be beneficial – and when it could actually sabotage your progress. For those with disordered eating tendencies, high-energy demands, or certain hormonal sensitivities, intermittent fasting can potentially do more harm than good.

Rather than viewing nutrition through a black-and-white lens, we emphasize finding sustainable approaches that align with your unique lifestyle, hunger patterns, and psychological relationship with food. The most effective nutritional strategy isn't the trendiest one – it's the one you can maintain consistently while supporting your energy, performance, and quality of life. Whether you decide fasting fits your lifestyle or not, this episode equips you with the unbiased information you need to make an informed choice about your nutrition approach.

Studies Referenced:

1. Lowe, D. A., Wu, N., Rohdin-Bibby, L., Moore, A. H., Kelly, N., Liu, Y., et al. (2020).
   Effects of time-restricted eating on weight loss and other metabolic parameters in overweight and obese adults: a randomized clinical trial.
   JAMA Internal Medicine, 180(11), 1491–1499.
   https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.4153
2. Templeman, N. M., et al. (2022).
   Intermittent fasting, energy balance and associated health outcomes in humans.
   Annual Review of Nutrition, 42, 135–158.
   https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nutr-122020-015743
3. Harvie, M. N., & Howell, A. (2020).
   Could intermittent fasting reduce breast cancer risk?
   BMJ, 370, m2943.
   https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m2943
4. Longo, V. D., & Panda, S. (2016).
   Fasting, circadian rhythms, and time-restricted feeding in healthy lifespan.
   Cell Metabolism, 23(6), 1048–1059.
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2016.06.001
5. Headland, M., Clifton, P. M., Carter, S., Keogh, J. B. (2021).
   Weight-loss outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of intermittent energy restriction trials lasting a minimum of 6 months.
   Obesity Reviews, 22(1), e13104.
   https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13104

https://www.facebook.com/coachadamkelley/

Instagram: @coachadamkelley

www.transformedhealthcoach.com

Send us a text

The promise of spot reduction has been luring fitness enthusiasts for decades. Who wouldn't want to simply target those stubborn areas with specific exercises and watch the fat melt away? Unfortunately, as we reveal in this myth-busting episode, the human body doesn't work that way.

Spot reduction – the idea that you can eliminate fat from specific areas by exercising those body parts – sounds logical but lacks scientific support. We dive deep into why those endless crunches aren't flattening your stomach and what science actually says about fat loss. Drawing from multiple research studies, we explain how your body systematically pulls from fat stores across your entire physique, with genetics largely determining which areas slim down first and which remain stubbornly resistant.

The conversation takes a fascinating turn as we explore the different types of body fat (visceral versus subcutaneous) and why belly fat can be particularly challenging to lose. We examine how hormones like cortisol and insulin influence fat storage patterns, and why stress management and quality sleep are just as crucial to your body composition goals as diet and exercise. Perhaps most interestingly, we reveal how abdominal training without addressing overall body fat can actually make your midsection appear larger – the exact opposite of what most people want!

Ready for solutions? We outline the proven strategies that actually work: sustainable caloric deficits, full-body strength training, high-protein nutrition, stress management, and quality sleep. Our approach focuses on sustainable lifestyle changes rather than quick fixes or miracle solutions. Whether you're just beginning your fitness journey or you've been frustrated by lack of progress despite countless ab workouts, this episode provides the clarity and direction you need to transform your approach and finally see results.

Studies Cited:

1. Ramírez-Campillo R, et al. (2013).
   Spot reduction is a myth: localized fat loss is not influenced by resistance training.
   Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 27(12), 3116–3121.
   https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e31828f1e2f
2. Katch FI, et al. (1984).
   Effects of sit-up exercise training on adipose cell size and adiposity.
   Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 55(3), 242–247.
   https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1984.10608404
3. Vispute SS, et al. (2011).
   The effect of abdominal exercise on abdominal fat.
   Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 25(9), 2559–2564.
   https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181fb4a46

https://www.facebook.com/coachadamkelley/

Instagram: @coachadamkelley

www.transformedhealthcoach.com