🌿 Occupational Therapy Isn’t Just Biomechanical: Reclaiming the Psychosocial Heart of OT Titelbild

🌿 Occupational Therapy Isn’t Just Biomechanical: Reclaiming the Psychosocial Heart of OT

🌿 Occupational Therapy Isn’t Just Biomechanical: Reclaiming the Psychosocial Heart of OT

Jetzt kostenlos hören, ohne Abo

Details anzeigen
ZEITLICH BEGRENZTES ANGEBOT. Nur 0,99 € pro Monat für die ersten 3 Monate. 3 Monate für 0,99 €/Monat, danach 9,95 €/Monat. Bedingungen gelten. Jetzt starten.

Über diesen Titel

 I hopped on live this week after a rich conversation in the Practical OT Facebook group (hi Chris! 🙌).Chris shared The Intentional Relationship Model — Renee Taylor’s seminal text on therapeutic use of self and the relational core of practice (and yes, the IRM lineage connects to Gary Kielhofner and MOHO).That post opened a door I care deeply about:Why do so many of us still feel hesitant—or “naughty”—bringing the psychosocial domain into “traditional” OT settings?Short answer: our systems trained us to separate what OT was never meant to split.🧠 Our Roots Were Never Split: OT = Psychobiological IntegrationEarly psychiatrist Adolf Meyer, who co-founded the American Occupational Therapy Association alongside Eleanor Clarke Slagle, coined the term psychobiology — a framework for understanding human beings as integrated systems of mind, body, and environment (Meyer, 1922).He argued that disturbances in this balance—not isolated mental or physical “defects”—were the source of illness. The therapeutic goal was to restore rhythm and meaning in daily life through occupation.“It is the proper rhythm and balance of activity and rest, of work and play, of day and night, that constitute the very basis of health.” — Adolf Meyer, 1922This psychobiological lens is the taproot of occupational therapy’s foundations in the moral treatment and arts and crafts movements — where engagement in creative, purposeful occupation supported emotional regulation, identity reconstruction, and social participation.Our profession was born as a psychosocial intervention, long before it became entrenched in the biomechanical model.That continuity remains explicit in the Occupational Therapy Practice Framework: Domain & Process, 4th Edition (AOTA, 2020): occupation is not just biomechanical task performance.It is meaning- and purpose-laden activity shaped by volition, identity, roles, and context.If we leave out the psychosocial domain, we’re not fully addressing or assessing occupation — our primary protected and skilled domain across all U.S. practice settings.📌 Fun fact: The 2020 revision of the OTPF-4 intentionally removed preparatory activities and exercise-centered approaches as stand-alone interventions to reaffirm that occupational therapy is grounded in occupation itself—not in isolated physical techniques. Even physical therapy is now shifting toward functional outcomes-based reimbursement per CMS guidance.🩺 The Policy Playbook (So You Can Feel Confident)You don’t need permission to practice holistically — you already have it.Here’s language you can cite and stand on:“Occupational therapy services are... medically prescribed treatment concerned with improving or restoring functions... or, where function has been permanently lost or reduced... to improve the individual’s ability to perform those tasks required for independent functioning.”— Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, §230.2ANotice: this doesn’t say only when function is lost due to a physiologic cause.CMS explicitly recognizes psychosocially oriented activity as skilled occupational therapy.“The planning, implementing, and supervising of individualized therapeutic activity programs as part of an overall active treatment program for a patient with a diagnosed psychiatric illness; e.g., the use of sewing activities which require following a pattern to reduce confusion and restore reality orientation in a schizophrenic patient.”— (CMS, 2014, §230.2A)That’s not fringe OT — it’s federal definition of practice.📎 Take-away: Skilled OT that restores or compensates for ADL/IADL performance — including interventions addressing motivation, affect, cognition, behavior, and role disruption — is squarely within coverage expectations.Psychosocial isn’t “extra”; it’s how independence is achieved — and how readmissions are prevented.🖇️ Direct link to CMS formal guidelines for covered OT services⚖️ Mental Health Parity and OT’s Expanding RoleSince the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA) of 2008, federal law has required that insurance coverage for mental health and substance-use services be comparable to coverage for physical health conditions.This means psychosocial dysfunction cannot be treated as less legitimate than biomechanical dysfunction.However, implementation remains uneven. Many payers still reimburse only for “physical” goals — despite federal parity law and the CMS definition of OT practice.Parity isn’t optional—it’s our ethical mandate.It ensures that the mental, emotional, and social determinants of participation receive the same respect as physical rehabilitation.🎥 Seeing It in ActionWatch this short video:🎬 How Behavioral Health OT Can Be Integrated into Post-Acute Settings to Reduce Hospital ReadmissionsIt shows how embedding occupational therapy into post-acute care reduces readmissions, enhances safety, and ...
Noch keine Rezensionen vorhanden