First-gen American of Mexican descent.

PhD in Social Psychology.

Reason, truth, Rostand, marksmanship, and Kate McKinnon.

I stand with – and in – the rain.

The discussion between Tom and Joe Duarte centers around Joe's criticism of the widely cited statistic that 97% of scientists agree on human-caused global warming. Joe argues that the study supporting this claim was fundamentally flawed and fraudulent, relying on a methodologically unsound review of abstracts by biased, non-expert individuals. He emphasizes the widespread dissemination and acceptance of this flawed study as evidence of institutional failure in academia and the media.

00:00 Introduction to Joe Duarte and Climate Consensus

00:25 The Politicization of Science

02:39 The 97% Climate Consensus Claim

06:03 Flaws in the Consensus Methodology

09:41 Irrelevant Papers in the Consensus

17:22 Systematic Failures and Misinterpretations

27:31 Critique of Paper Counting Methods

28:12 Attempts to Retract the Paper

29:15 Daniel Camon's Political Bias

30:33 The Impeach Letter Incident

32:48 Inappropriate Journal for Consensus Study

35:26 Possibility of Retraction

41:34 Scientific Fraud Allegations

48:55 Impact on Academic Integrity

53:20 Closing Remarks and Resources

https://x.com/ValidScience

https://validscience.substack.com/

========

AI summaries of all of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summaries

https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1