Hey! I'd love to hear your thoughts, send me a voice note.

Khyra Ishaq: Five Months at Home (Case File)

On the morning of 17 May 2008, an ambulance was called to a house in Handsworth, Birmingham. Paramedics found seven-year-old Khyra Ishaq dead. She weighed thirty-seven pounds, and the Court of Appeal later noted that the house held an abundance of good, wholesome food. Five months earlier she had been a pupil with a perfect attendance record. In December 2007 her school reported that she had been taking food. That same month her mother wrote to say she would educate her at home.

This is the case file on Khyra Ishaq. I follow how the one institution that saw her every day dropped out of her life, and how a school's concern about food went into a referral that was inaccurately recorded and then lost. I also cover the serious case review, the first in England to be published in full. It found that some agencies lost sight of the child, and that home education law gave local authorities no power to monitor or inspect. I cover the two prosecutions and sentences, the 2011 Court of Appeal judgment, and Angela Gordon's release in 2017. I say plainly where the record runs out, including the outcome of the social workers' disciplinary and regulatory processes.

I also draw on more than fourteen years of social work practice to look at six areas, and end with questions for professionals.

Chapters (approximate):

• Cold open: the 999 call
• The family before Junaid Abuhamza
• December 2007: the food, the letter, the school gap
• Home education and the doorstep problem
• The serious case review
• What happened to the professionals
• The trials, the pleas and the sentences
• The Court of Appeal and release
• Six strands for professionals
• Questions to take back to your practice

Content note: The episode discusses the starvation and death of a child. The script deliberately avoids a detailed account of what the children went through, in line with the court's own approach.

Hey! I'd love to hear your thoughts, send me a voice note.

In the spring of 2002, a Florida state worker went looking for a four-year-old girl in a foster home. She wasn't there. The woman caring for her said a stranger claiming to work for the state had taken her away for an evaluation, fifteen months earlier. In that time the Department of Children and Families had kept paying for her care, and one court report said she was safe in her caretaker's home.

This is the case file on Rilya Wilson. I follow the case from her removal as a baby to her placement with a caregiver whose own record the agency never uncovered, then to the caseworker whose visits stopped while her paperwork continued. I cover the 2013 conviction of Geralyn Graham, and I say plainly what the court record leaves unresolved: Rilya's body has never been found, and no court has ruled on what happened to her.

I also draw on more than fourteen years of social work practice to look at six areas: the gap between records and reality, caseworker caseloads, background checks that can't see a person using dozens of names, the money that kept flowing, and what accountability looks like when a child is never found. The episode ends with six questions for professionals.

Chapters (approximate):

• Cold open: the visit that found nobody
• Rilya's early life and the fragmented family
• The caregiver the agency didn't check
• The caseworker and the fifteen months
• How the disappearance came to light
• The investigation, the charges and the trial
• What the court record does and doesn't establish
• Six strands for professionals
• Questions to take back to your practice

Content note: The episode discusses the abuse and death of a child. The script deliberately leaves out some details from the court record. Discretion advised

Hey! I'd love to hear your thoughts, send me a voice note.

Nobody Looked: The Jeffrey Baldwin Case

In 1998, a Toronto children's aid society approved a grandmother and her husband as legal guardians of four small children. The agency held a file on the woman that went back almost thirty years. It held a conviction for assaulting her own five-month-old daughter, and records on the man she lived with, who had beaten two of her other children into hospital. Nobody checked any of it.

Four years later, five-year-old Jeffrey Baldwin was dead. He weighed twenty-one pounds, about what he weighed on his first birthday.

This episode follows the case from the agency's early files to the criminal trial and the 2013 coroner's inquest. It covers the decisions that put Jeffrey in that house and the warnings that went nowhere. It also covers what the jury recommended, and how much of it has been done.

In this episode:

• How a grandmother's persistent concern was recorded in the file as "a family strength"
• Why criminal record checks were run on the parents losing the children, and never on the grandparents gaining them
• The caseworker's inquest testimony: "We get what we get"
• Life inside the house, and the six adults who did not speak up
• The trial, the second-degree murder convictions and the appeals
• The inquest: 103 recommendations and the slow rollout of CPIN, Ontario's shared information system
• Six practice strands for professionals: kinship care assessment, file closure at placement, information systems, strengths-based practice without verification, bystanders, and the invisible pre-school child
• Questions for anyone working with children and families

Content note: this episode describes severe child neglect and abuse, including starvation and confinement. Listener discretion is advised.

If you work with children and families, please share this episode with a colleague. If it was useful, subscribe so you don't miss the next one.

Sources include the Abell independent review of the Catholic Children's Aid Society of Toronto, coverage of the trial and inquest by CBC, Global News, CTV and the Globe and Mail, and Ontario government service documents on CPIN.

Hey! I'd love to hear your thoughts, send me a voice note.

Finley Boden lived thirty-nine days after a family court decided he was safe to go home. He had been removed from his parents' care within weeks of his birth in February 2020, due to heavy cannabis use, an unsafe home, and the risk of domestic violence between them. Social workers who knew the family best recommended a cautious six-month transition back into their care. A court ordered eight weeks instead. Finley went home — and on Christmas Day, 2020, he was dead, with more than 130 injuries on his ten-month-old body.

In this episode, we go inside a case that produced one of the most damning single lines in child safeguarding review history: "a child died as the result of abuse when he should have been one of the most protected children in the local authority area." We cover the pre-birth child protection plan, the gap between what social workers asked for and what the court ordered, the thirty-nine days after Finley's return home during which his parents actively denied access to professionals, the post-mortem findings, the trial and sentencing of Shannon Marsden and Stephen Boden, the safeguarding review's eleven recommendations, and the reforms it produced.

Content warning: This episode contains detailed descriptions of child abuse and death. Listener discretion advised.

In this episode:

• Finley's pre-birth child protection plan and his parents' documented history
• Shannon Marsden's message to a relative, sent four days before Finley's death, describing fear of Stephen Boden
• The gap between the six-month transition social workers recommended and the eight-week timeline the court ordered
• The thirty-nine days after reunification, and how Finley's parents obstructed access to him
• The post-mortem: more than 130 injuries, untreated sepsis and pneumonia
• Trial, conviction, and life sentences for Shannon Marsden and Stephen Boden
• The Derby and Derbyshire Safeguarding Children Partnership's review and its eleven recommendations
• Reform: changes to Cafcass's supervision policy for family court advisers
• How this case compares to Jordan Belliveau, Nixzmary Brown, Nia Glassie, and Star Hobson, covered elsewhere in this series
• Questions for anyone working in child protection today

Sources: ITV News Central, the Crown Prosecution Service, the Derby and Derbyshire Safeguarding Children Partnership's Local Child Safeguarding Practice Review, Express & Star, Yorkshire Post, Cafcass public statements.

Hey! I'd love to hear your thoughts, send me a voice note.

Episode Description:

Nia Glassie was three years old when the adults responsible for her — her mother, her mother's much younger boyfriend, his brother, and other adults moving through their Rotorua household — began treating her injuries as entertainment. Over roughly three months in 2007, she was spun inside a running clothes dryer, tied to a rotary clothesline, held upside down over an open fire, and used as a live target for adults practicing wrestling moves. On July 20, 2007, she was kicked in the head hard enough to knock her unconscious — and left without medical care for more than thirty hours.

In this episode, we go inside the case that became shorthand in New Zealand for a child protection system that had prior, serious contact with this family and still couldn't see — or act on — what was happening inside that house. We cover the household's structure and instability, what Child, Youth and Family already knew before Nia's death, the neighbours who saw warning signs and said nothing, the verdicts and sentencing of the five adults charged, the coroner's scathing findings and his recommendation for a national child register that went unimplemented for years, the reforms that followed (the Children's Act 2014 and the 2017 overhaul that created Oranga Tamariki), and where the people responsible for her death stand today.

Content warning: This episode contains detailed descriptions of child abuse and death. Listener discretion advised.

In this episode:

• The household: a multi-adult, transient living arrangement and the age gaps inside it
• What CYFS already knew — and why a prior child's removal didn't travel forward to protect the next one
• Three months of escalating, shared abuse and the neighbours who nearly intervened
• The thirty-hour delay before Nia reached hospital
• Charges, verdicts, and sentencing of Lisa Kuka, Wiremu Curtis, Michael Curtis, Oriwa Kemp, and Michael Pearson
• Coroner Wallace Bain's findings — and the under-five register recommendation that wasn't adopted until after another child, Moko Rangitoheriri, died
• Reform: the Children's Act 2014 and the creation of Oranga Tamariki in 2017
• Where things stand now: parole updates on all three convicted adults
• How this case compares to Moko Rangitoheriri, Jordan Belliveau, and Nixzmary Brown, covered elsewhere in this series
• Questions for anyone working in child protection today

Sources: NZ Herald, RNZ, Newstalk ZB, coronial findings (Coroner Wallace Bain), New Zealand Parole Board decisions, and reporting on the Children's Act 2014 and Oranga Tamariki reforms.

Hey! I'd love to hear your thoughts, send me a voice note.

Jordan Belliveau was two years old when he was reunified with his parents in the summer of 2018, months after his own court-appointed guardian ad litem formally objected. Five months later, his mother told police a stranger had abducted him from a park. It wasn't true — she had killed him weeks earlier and buried him behind a recreation center in Largo, Florida.

This episode traces how a two-year-old with an active dependency case ended up back in a home the system had already found unsafe: a magistrate who overruled the one advocate whose sole job was to speak for him, a domestic violence arrest involving a death threat against police that never reached the judge who signed a permanent custody order two days later, and a state review that later found the reunification was driven by the parents' "perceived compliance": not verified change. It also looks at the three-agency structure managing the case (Pinellas County Sheriff's Office, Directions for Living, Eckerd Connects), the reform legislation that followed (Jordan's Law), and how this case compares to others covered on this show, including Nixzmary Brown, Zymere Perkins, and Mason Jet Lee.

Content warning: this episode discusses child abuse, domestic violence, and child death in detail.

Sourcing note: this episode is built from public court records, Florida DCF's own internal case review, and contemporaneous reporting (Tampa Bay Times and others). Direct quotes are used only where they were reported as verbatim; several details: including the resolution of the father's domestic violence charge and the final custody outcome for Jordan's younger sister: are not publicly confirmed, and the episode says so rather than guessing.

Please reach out to me at files@childprotectionfiles.com . I love hearing from you to just say hi or if you would like a specific case covered by me.

Hey! I'd love to hear your thoughts, send me a voice note.

Between October 2004 and December 2005, New York City's child welfare hotline received at least eight separate reports about one Brooklyn family. On January 11, 2006, seven-year-old Nixzmary Brown died weighing just 36 pounds, having been beaten, starved, and confined to a room in her family's apartment. This episode traces the full case file: the fourteen months of missed warning signs, the trial and conviction of her mother Nixzaliz Santiago and stepfather Cesar Rodriguez, the sweeping reforms that followed inside New York City's child protection agency, and the sobering five-years-later coda of Marchella Brett-Pierce, a second child who died on the same agency's watch. Along the way, the episode draws research comparisons to Baby P, Zymere Perkins, Adrian Jones, Star Hobson, and Arthur Labinjo-Hughes, and closes with hard questions for anyone currently working in the field.

Runtime: 74 minutes

Content warning: This episode contains detailed descriptions of child abuse, starvation, and death. Listener discretion advised.

Sources referenced: NBC News; Wikipedia; New York City Department of Investigation case review; Youth Law Center / New York Times reporting on ACS reforms; Schnitzer & Ewigman, Pediatrics (2005) study on child fatality risk factors; Child Welfare League of America caseload standards; NYC Independent Budget Office review of post-2006 ACS reforms.

Hey! I'd love to hear your thoughts, send me a voice note.

Child Protection Files

Episode Description

In the eight months before sixteen-month-old Star Hobson died in Bradford, West Yorkshire, at least five different people who loved her (a family friend, her grandmother, her great-grandfather, her father, her grandfather) independently contacted social services or the police to say she was in danger. Every referral was investigated. Every case was closed.

On the 22nd of September, 2020, Star died in hospital from an abdominal injury a judge would later compare, in terms of force, to a road traffic accident. Her mother's partner, Savannah Brockhill, was convicted of murder. Her mother, Frankie Smith, was convicted of causing or allowing her death.

This episode reconstructs Star's case in full: who Savannah Brockhill and Frankie Smith were, the pattern of referrals and closures between January and September 2020, the CCTV and social media evidence presented at Bradford Crown Court, the sentencing remarks of Mrs Justice Lambert.

Content warning: this episode contains detailed discussion of the sustained abuse and death of a child. Listener discretion is advised.

Case Outcome (as of this recording)

Savannah Brockhill remains in prison serving her life sentence (twenty-five-year minimum before parole eligibility). Frankie Smith is serving her twelve-year sentence and, per multiple news reports, was expected to become eligible for release on licence around September 2026.

Sources and Research Referenced

• Joint National Review into the deaths of Star Hobson and Arthur Labinjo Hughes, Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel (May 2022)
• Independent Office for Police Conduct investigation into West Yorkshire Police (concluded November 2022)
• Sentencing remarks of Mrs Justice Lambert, Bradford Crown Court (December 2021)
• Schnitzer, P. G. and Ewigman, B. (2005), Household Composition and Fatal Child Maltreatment, Pediatrics: on elevated risk associated with an unrelated adult in the household
• Eileen Munro's research on confirmation bias and fixed thinking in child protection decision-making, and her 2011 review of the English child protection system
• Scoping review on child protection workforce turnover, British Journal of Social Work

Discussion Questions

1. What happens in your own system when the same family generates a fifth referral, a sixth, a seventh, from different reporters over a period of months? Is there a mechanism that surfaces the full pattern, or does each new contact start from zero?
2. When a possible motive is offered for dismissing a concern (a family feud, a grudge, disapproval of a parent's relationship or identity), what is the process for testing that explanation against the facts, rather than letting its mere possibility settle the question?
3. If your own team or service is genuinely in crisis, understaffed, high turnover, overloaded, what is being done about that as a safeguarding issue in its own right, not just a staffing problem to be managed around?

This episode is a forensic case analysis presented by a social worker with 14+ years of industry experience. All case details are drawn from public court reporting, sentencing remarks, and official review findings. Prisoner locations and release dates are subject to change and are current only as of the recording date.

Let me know if you would like me to cover any cases by emailing files@childprotectionfiles.com.au