Hunger at the door, power in the halls, and a pulpit that must stay free enough to pull a president’s ear—this conversation goes straight to the heart of what a church owes its city. We start where the early church did: Acts 6. When injustice surfaced in daily food service, the apostles created the diaconate, proving that prayer and preaching do not cancel practical mercy—they require it. From there, Matthew 25 raises the stakes: serving the hungry, the stranger, and the prisoner is serving Christ himself. Neglect is not a paperwork error; it is a spiritual failure.

We explore how generosity worked in real time in Acts 4, where believers shared so no one lacked—voluntarily, transparently, and under accountable leadership. That vision challenges both hoarded wealth and manipulative dependence. The conversation gets concrete: churches can build senior housing, organize reliable food distribution, and partner with trusted agencies. Yet compassion needs guardrails. Scripture distinguishes those unable to work from those unwilling, directing abundant aid to true need while guiding the able toward dignity, skills, and employment.

Then we draw the boundary that protects both church and nation: complement, don’t merge. Using King Uzziah’s overreach as a vivid case study, we argue that spiritual and political offices should remain distinct so they can correct each other. Pastors should not hold public office while shepherding a congregation; officials who follow Jesus still need a prophetic church free to challenge them. Finally, we turn to Romans 13 and the call to be salt and light: officials as stewards who reward good and restrain evil, believers as citizens who vote, serve, tell the truth, and make visible good works that cause others to glorify God.

If this conversation sharpened your view of mercy, justice, and leadership, subscribe, share it with a friend, and leave a review telling us how your community is serving your city today.

Support the show

A voice shaped by classrooms, radio waves, and the rough edges of politics sits across from us and makes a simple claim: authority exists to serve human flourishing. Pastor Robert Opont walks us through his path from Haitian educator and Radio Lumière journalist to senator, then across an ocean to years of pastoral work in Florida and New Jersey. The story is gripping on its own—threats, exile, rebuilding—but the heart of our time is what he learned about power, conscience, and the steadying role of faith.

We explore how politics and religion can share an origin without collapsing into each other. In Opont’s view, politics orders the common good, while religion keeps the soul aimed at the good itself. When rulers drift, prophetic voices should recalibrate direction. When churches chase celebrity, they forget their charge to teach, warn, and heal. He brings scripture to the surface not as a museum piece but as a living framework: unchanging in core values yet applied with wisdom to new terrain. Technology and social media amplify both insight and error, so language must be chosen with care, expertise held with humility, and progress judged by what it does for the most vulnerable.

The conversation turns intimate with parenting, responsibility, and the hard edge of consequences. Freedom is not license; adulthood begins when we bear the weight of our choices. Pastor Opont shares practical, memorable images—from car insurance to house rules—that illustrate how families can raise adults who respect law, serve neighbors, and carry conviction without noise. We close by mapping the conditions each life stage demands, and how healthy authority—spiritual and civic—keeps communities whole.

If this resonates, follow the show, share it with a friend who cares about faith and public life, and leave a review to help others find these conversations.

Support the show

A fast post can change a life—sometimes in ways that end in a courtroom. We dig into the real mechanics of defamation on social media, from the moment an unverified claim gets traction to the tests a judge uses to decide whether it crossed the legal line. Along the way, we unpack why certain stories spread, how attention-based monetization tilts creators toward risk, and what practical guardrails keep your voice powerful and safe.

We break down the core elements of defamation in plain language: false statements presented as fact, publication, fault, and damages. Then we draw a bright line between protected opinion and harmful assertions, showing how phrasing, sourcing, and context can flip a post from commentary into liability. You’ll hear why proof of harm goes beyond lost sales to include reputational damage and emotional impact, and how creators can document or mitigate that harm with timely corrections and retractions.

Platforms complicate everything. Automated moderation, mass reporting, and monetization can both amplify and punish the same content. We share straightforward practices to navigate this terrain: verify with multiple sources, disclose uncertainty, separate analysis from claims, and keep notes that demonstrate due diligence. Whether you’re a journalist, a creator, or someone who just wants to post responsibly, you’ll come away with a toolkit for ethical, legally aware communication that builds trust instead of burning it.

If this conversation helps you think differently about what you publish, tap follow, share it with someone who posts a lot, and leave a quick review—what’s the one habit you’ll adopt before you hit post?

Support the show

One viral post can change a life, for better or worse. We sit down with legal and media voices to pull apart how defamation actually works online, why intimidation flourishes on fast platforms, and what concrete steps protect both free expression and real people’s reputations. Instead of recycling clichés, we trace the path from sender to receiver, show how context gets stripped to chase views, and explain why a 30‑second clip can mislead more than a careful long-form report.

We break down the legal elements in plain language: what counts as publication, how falsity is shown, where libel and slander apply, and why damages and intent matter. The messy middle—opinion versus fact—gets the spotlight, because a statement that implies undisclosed facts can be more dangerous than a blunt opinion. We talk through how journalists authenticate information with primary documents, named sources, and attribution, and how those habits translate to responsible creators on TikTok, YouTube, Facebook, and Instagram.

Social media’s speed and scale raise the stakes. Algorithms amplify outrage, corrections lag, and AI now fabricates convincing voices, images, and “documents” at a tap, making traceability harder and reputations easier to wound. Through real examples, we show how false claims spread, what a victim must prove, and why the burden of proof is so tough to meet. Then we get practical: questions to ask before sharing, red flags that signal bad sourcing, ways to preserve evidence, and proportionate responses—from right of reply to legal action.

If you care about truth, fair debate, and your own credibility, this conversation gives you a toolkit: verify, contextualize, attribute, and resist the temptation to decontextualize for clicks. Subscribe, share with a friend who posts before they read, and leave a review telling us your rule of thumb before you hit publish.

Support the show

Healing doesn’t come with a finish line—it asks for honesty, patience, and the nerve to say no when your peace is on the line. We welcome writer and registered behavior technician Jane Ann Leandre for a candid, uplifting conversation about defining trauma on your own terms, finding the right therapist, and building a self-care routine that actually fits who you are. Jane shares how the pandemic forced her to face long-suppressed feelings, why journaling became her safest room, and how music, solitude, and movement help her reset without apology.

Together we take on the most stubborn myths: that healing should be quick, that emotions mean you’re “not over it,” and that saying no is unkind. Jane explains how vulnerability works for her—slowly, page by page—and why friends who respect boundaries make real intimacy possible. We talk about resilience as more than endurance; it’s the wisdom to let go of people, places, and patterns that drain you. And we dig into how trauma can look different for each of us—quiet on the outside, loud on the inside, or immobilizing in the open—and how to meet loved ones where they are without pushing their timeline.

Jane also reads two poems, What Is Silence? and The Tapestry, from her new book A Thread I Can’t Hold, a raw and hopeful collection that traces suffocating emotion to a steadier breath. If you need language for what you’re feeling, or permission to make your self-care your own, this conversation offers tools and solidarity you can use today. Listen now, share it with someone who needs it, and tell us: what boundary will you protect this week? If you enjoy the show, follow, rate, and leave a review to help others find us.

Support the show

What if justice felt like something you could touch every day—at work, at home, on your block? We dive into restorative justice as a lived practice that blends accountability with dignity, asking harder questions than punishment alone ever does: Who was harmed? What do they need? What will actually reduce the risk of future harm?

We start with the fragile first months after release, where stability beats pride. A $10 job can be the smartest move in the room when rent and food come first. From there, we build toward passion on solid ground—stacking small wins, using city programs for housing and essentials, and connecting people to paths they actually want. Along the way, we name the real culprits that derail progress: ego, impulsive anger, and the myth that walking away means weakness. Emotional regulation becomes a practical safety tool, not a buzzword, especially for young people navigating loyalty, grief, and triggers.

Then we draw a bright line between branding and substance. Slapping “restorative justice” on a bus or a one-off event doesn’t heal anyone. We talk about justice as daily treatment, not a press release—survivor-centered, community-led, and humble about limits. From New Zealand’s youth interventions to local circles that ask “what do you need,” we explore how unmet basic needs drive harm and how thoughtful support can stop it. We do not shy away from severe cases, including sexual violence, where truth, consequence, and a hard look at why power felt good are nonnegotiable.

Finally, we sketch a model that communities can own: creative funding through neighborhood events, referral partnerships that do not hand control to the system, and a shared value that repair is everyone’s work. If you’re skeptical, we’re listening—bring a better alternative that protects survivors, lowers recidivism, and builds public safety people can feel. Otherwise, lean in with us. Subscribe, share this episode with someone who cares about real safety, and tell us: what does repair look like where you live?

Support the show

What if justice worked because people felt human again? We open with a rare global moment—the UN revisiting the Copenhagen Agreement—and ground it in daily life, where communities decide whether harm ends in punishment or repair. With Miss V as our guide, we unpack restorative justice beyond the headlines: not a buzzword, but a living practice that starts with belonging and scales through simple, repeatable habits.

You’ll hear how “circle parties” in New York City flip the script. No clipboards or mandates—just a bar, a table, a talking piece, and a mix of neighbors, returning citizens, and practitioners. In that relaxed space, people who were once reduced to case numbers share stories, ask for help, and get real referrals on the spot. Jobs, GED classes, counseling, transit money—resources move because the room is wired with relationships. The point isn’t to build another nonprofit; it’s to route people into what already exists and fill the human gaps that programs can’t reach.

We also take on the hard stuff: racial disparities in the criminal legal system, the weight of stigma after prison, and the tension between structural harm and personal agency. Miss V brings firsthand stories of change—like the man who chose restraint over retaliation and rebuilt his life decision by decision. Together, we map a practical approach to reentry where accountability and dignity can coexist, and where everyday culture, not crisis response, carries the work forward. If you’ve wondered how to make justice feel real, start here: repair the harm, widen the circle, and let people breathe.

If this conversation moved you, follow the show, share it with a friend, and leave a review so more people can find it. Your voice helps grow these circles.

Support the show

Love shouldn’t cost your health. We dive into the quiet ways toxic relationships erode mental health and the loud signals your body sends when safety is missing—anxiety that never powers down, sleepless nights, panic attacks that seem to come from nowhere, and blood pressure readings that don’t lie. From there, we move into the hard truth about stigma: why seeking therapy still feels taboo in some communities, why men are told to swallow emotion, and how shame keeps people stuck and isolated.

With clarity and compassion, we lay out a realistic exit strategy. It starts with a blunt pros-and-cons list that cuts through wishful thinking, then moves to therapy or mediation to plan an exit that doesn’t turn kids into collateral damage. We talk through housing, visitation, and shared rules, showing how co‑parenting can thrive when bitterness isn’t steering the wheel. We also tackle cultural and faith pressures to “stay for the kids” and flip the script: children learn what they live. Modeling respect, boundaries, and calm repair is better than preserving a picture-perfect facade that teaches fear.

Author E. Michelle joins us to share how journaling through a painful past relationship became the seed for Love of a Lifetime, a novella that captures the arc from infatuation to disillusionment to growth. Her insights make space for a crucial shift many miss: after a string of toxic partners, healthy love can feel unfamiliar. We offer practical markers of safety—consistency, accountability, and room for vulnerability—so you can recognize it when it arrives.

If you’re questioning your relationship, ask the legacy questions: Am I proud of us? Do I feel safe and seen? Would I want my child to copy what we model? When the answers unsettle you, that’s not defeat—that’s data. Use it to seek help, plan wisely, and choose health. If this conversation helped, follow the show, share it with a friend who needs it, and leave a review to help more people find a path to safer love.

Support the show