A fast post can change a life—sometimes in ways that end in a courtroom. We dig into the real mechanics of defamation on social media, from the moment an unverified claim gets traction to the tests a judge uses to decide whether it crossed the legal line. Along the way, we unpack why certain stories spread, how attention-based monetization tilts creators toward risk, and what practical guardrails keep your voice powerful and safe.

We break down the core elements of defamation in plain language: false statements presented as fact, publication, fault, and damages. Then we draw a bright line between protected opinion and harmful assertions, showing how phrasing, sourcing, and context can flip a post from commentary into liability. You’ll hear why proof of harm goes beyond lost sales to include reputational damage and emotional impact, and how creators can document or mitigate that harm with timely corrections and retractions.

Platforms complicate everything. Automated moderation, mass reporting, and monetization can both amplify and punish the same content. We share straightforward practices to navigate this terrain: verify with multiple sources, disclose uncertainty, separate analysis from claims, and keep notes that demonstrate due diligence. Whether you’re a journalist, a creator, or someone who just wants to post responsibly, you’ll come away with a toolkit for ethical, legally aware communication that builds trust instead of burning it.

If this conversation helps you think differently about what you publish, tap follow, share it with someone who posts a lot, and leave a quick review—what’s the one habit you’ll adopt before you hit post?

Support the show

One viral post can change a life, for better or worse. We sit down with legal and media voices to pull apart how defamation actually works online, why intimidation flourishes on fast platforms, and what concrete steps protect both free expression and real people’s reputations. Instead of recycling clichés, we trace the path from sender to receiver, show how context gets stripped to chase views, and explain why a 30‑second clip can mislead more than a careful long-form report.

We break down the legal elements in plain language: what counts as publication, how falsity is shown, where libel and slander apply, and why damages and intent matter. The messy middle—opinion versus fact—gets the spotlight, because a statement that implies undisclosed facts can be more dangerous than a blunt opinion. We talk through how journalists authenticate information with primary documents, named sources, and attribution, and how those habits translate to responsible creators on TikTok, YouTube, Facebook, and Instagram.

Social media’s speed and scale raise the stakes. Algorithms amplify outrage, corrections lag, and AI now fabricates convincing voices, images, and “documents” at a tap, making traceability harder and reputations easier to wound. Through real examples, we show how false claims spread, what a victim must prove, and why the burden of proof is so tough to meet. Then we get practical: questions to ask before sharing, red flags that signal bad sourcing, ways to preserve evidence, and proportionate responses—from right of reply to legal action.

If you care about truth, fair debate, and your own credibility, this conversation gives you a toolkit: verify, contextualize, attribute, and resist the temptation to decontextualize for clicks. Subscribe, share with a friend who posts before they read, and leave a review telling us your rule of thumb before you hit publish.

Support the show

Healing doesn’t come with a finish line—it asks for honesty, patience, and the nerve to say no when your peace is on the line. We welcome writer and registered behavior technician Jane Ann Leandre for a candid, uplifting conversation about defining trauma on your own terms, finding the right therapist, and building a self-care routine that actually fits who you are. Jane shares how the pandemic forced her to face long-suppressed feelings, why journaling became her safest room, and how music, solitude, and movement help her reset without apology.

Together we take on the most stubborn myths: that healing should be quick, that emotions mean you’re “not over it,” and that saying no is unkind. Jane explains how vulnerability works for her—slowly, page by page—and why friends who respect boundaries make real intimacy possible. We talk about resilience as more than endurance; it’s the wisdom to let go of people, places, and patterns that drain you. And we dig into how trauma can look different for each of us—quiet on the outside, loud on the inside, or immobilizing in the open—and how to meet loved ones where they are without pushing their timeline.

Jane also reads two poems, What Is Silence? and The Tapestry, from her new book A Thread I Can’t Hold, a raw and hopeful collection that traces suffocating emotion to a steadier breath. If you need language for what you’re feeling, or permission to make your self-care your own, this conversation offers tools and solidarity you can use today. Listen now, share it with someone who needs it, and tell us: what boundary will you protect this week? If you enjoy the show, follow, rate, and leave a review to help others find us.

Support the show