Theology Unplugged Titelbild

Theology Unplugged

Theology Unplugged

Von: C. Michael Patton
Jetzt kostenlos hören, ohne Abo

Join C. Michael Patton and friends for Theology Unplugged, a weekly podcast that dives deep into Christian theology, exploring challenging questions, and offering insightful discussions to deepen your faith. Discover the truth, embrace the journey, and engage with thought-provoking topics every week.C. Michael Patton Christentum Spiritualität
Folgen
  • 89. Through Theology in a Year: The Bible Is Irrelevant

    89. Through Theology in a Year: The Bible Is Irrelevant
    Jul 22 2026
    Is the Bible filled with irrelevant details? In one sense, yes—and that may be one reason to trust it. The biblical writers frequently preserve small, vivid, seemingly unnecessary details that do not advance the plot, establish a doctrine, or strengthen an argument. Why include them at all?

    In this episode of Theology Unplugged, Michael continues developing the cumulative case for the historical reliability and inspiration of Scripture by examining incidental—or apparently irrelevant—details in the Gospel accounts. Eyewitnesses often remember odd specifics simply because they saw them. Fabricated stories, by contrast, frequently make every detail serve the plot or argument.

    These incidental details do not prove that an account is historical. A skilled storyteller can deliberately invent realistic details to create the appearance of authenticity. Nevertheless, when details are vivid, unnecessary, unexplained, and naturally embedded in the narrative, they may bear the marks of genuine memory rather than calculated invention.

    Michael considers five striking examples. Mark remembers that Jesus was asleep in the stern of the boat “on the cushion.” He records that the crowd sat down on green grass before the feeding of the multitude. John identifies the high priest’s servant as Malchus, while Luke specifies that Peter cut off his right ear. John also remembers that he outran Peter to the empty tomb—a detail that proves nothing by itself, but sounds exactly like the kind of personal fact an eyewitness would remember.

    The strangest example may be the unnamed young man who followed Jesus after His arrest and escaped by leaving behind his linen garment and running away naked. The incident appears nowhere else in the Gospels, contributes little to the main plot, and raises the possibility that the story originated with the young man himself. Richard Bauckham argues that such a detail may preserve the testimony of someone personally involved in the event.

    Michael also considers the broader pattern of Scripture. The Bible preserves embarrassing admissions, unresolved theological tensions, difficult doctrines, genuine ambiguities, and people who repeatedly misunderstand God’s plan. These features do not establish historicity individually, but together they make Scripture look less like carefully controlled religious propaganda and more like testimony grounded in real people, events, perspectives, and memories.

    The Bible is not irrelevant in its message. But some of its apparently irrelevant details may be among its most revealing marks of authenticity.

    Get involved:
    Michael's public blog: https://credohouse.org
    Courses and Manuscript Reproductions from Michael and other scholars: https://credocourses.com
    Join us as we go through the great Fathers of the Faith in a year: https://throughthechurchfathers.com
    Support Michael and receive exclusive podcasts, courses, and much more: https://patreon.com/cmichaelpatton
    Mehr anzeigen Weniger anzeigen
    Weniger als 1 Minute
  • 88. Through Theology in a Year: Why the Gospels Are Embarrassing

    88. Through Theology in a Year: Why the Gospels Are Embarrassing
    Jul 16 2026
    Why do the Gospel writers preserve stories that appear awkward, damaging, or even embarrassing to the earliest Christians? If the Gospels were invented to persuade people to follow Jesus, why did their authors include details that made Jesus' family, His disciples, and some of His most important witnesses appear doubtful, confused, and unreliable?

    In this episode of Theology Unplugged, Michael continues developing the cumulative case for the historical reliability and inspiration of Scripture by examining the criterion of embarrassment. Historians recognize that people who fabricate stories normally avoid including material that damages their credibility. Nations celebrate their victories, movements polish the reputations of their founders, and religious communities generally portray their earliest leaders as courageous and faithful. The Gospels repeatedly do the opposite.

    Michael considers Jesus' baptism by John, whose baptism was associated with repentance and the forgiveness of sins. Why would the sinless Messiah submit to a baptism intended for sinners? He also examines the unbelief of Jesus' brothers, the claim that His family thought He was out of His mind, and John the Baptist's question from prison about whether Jesus truly was the one who was to come.

    The Gospel writers are equally candid about the failures of the disciples. Matthew records that some doubted even while standing before the risen Christ. Mark preserves Jesus' statement that no one knew the day or hour of His return—not even the Son. The Gospels place women at the center of the empty-tomb testimony despite the limited public and legal standing often given to women's testimony in the ancient world. They also preserve the strange account of Jesus cursing the fig tree when it was not the season for figs.

    Most significantly, the earliest Christians proclaimed a crucified and bodily risen Messiah. Crucifixion represented weakness, shame, rejection, and apparent divine curse. Bodily resurrection also sounded foolish to many within the Greco-Roman world. These were not culturally convenient beliefs created to make Christianity easier to accept. As Paul acknowledged, Christ crucified was a stumbling block to Jews and foolishness to Gentiles.

    The criterion of embarrassment does not prove that every Gospel account is historical, nor should it be applied mechanically or in isolation. Nevertheless, these embarrassing details contribute to a powerful cumulative argument when considered alongside the historical context, eyewitness characteristics, incidental details, manuscript evidence, and other marks of authenticity. The Gospels do not read like carefully sanitized propaganda. They preserve the story in all its difficulty because the writers believed these events actually happened.

    Get involved:
    Michael's public blog: https://credohouse.org
    Courses and Manuscript Reproductions from Michael and other scholars: https://credocourses.com
    Join us as we go through the great Fathers of the Faith in a year: https://throughthechurchfathers.com
    Support Michael and receive exclusive podcasts, courses, and much more: https://patreon.com/cmichaelpatton
    Mehr anzeigen Weniger anzeigen
    Weniger als 1 Minute
  • 87. Through Theology in a Year: Evidencing Inspiration

    87. Through Theology in a Year: Evidencing Inspiration
    Jul 15 2026
    How can we be certain that the Bible is inspired? What evidence supports the Christian claim that the Scriptures are uniquely the Word of God? In this episode of Theology Unplugged, Michael begins examining the cumulative case for biblical inspiration, including Scripture's self-attestation, its uniqueness, its historicity, its prophetic character, the testimony of Christ, its life-changing power, and the testimony of the Holy Spirit.

    Michael begins with Scripture's testimony concerning itself. The Bible repeatedly claims to speak the words of God, but self-attestation cannot stand alone as the entire argument. Simply saying that the Bible is inspired because the Bible says it is inspired would appear circular. Nevertheless, self-attestation is a necessary part of the evidence. If Scripture truly is the Word of God, there can be no higher authority by which its divine inspiration may be authenticated. As Hebrews says of God, because He had no one greater by whom to swear, He swore by Himself.

    The episode also considers the remarkable uniqueness of the Bible: a collection of 66 books, written by more than 40 authors from very different backgrounds, in three languages, on three continents, over approximately 1,500 years. Despite these differences, the books form a unified theological and redemptive story unlike any other collection of literature.

    Michael then turns to the historicity of Scripture and explains the importance of examining both internal and external evidence. Christianity does not ask people to accept its historical claims merely because the Bible is inspired. Rather, the historical claims themselves—most importantly, the resurrection of Jesus Christ—must be investigated. If the resurrection occurred as a historical event, Christianity is true whether or not someone has already accepted a complete doctrine of biblical inspiration.

    Finally, Michael begins considering the internal evidence for Scripture's historical reliability, especially its striking honesty. The biblical writers consistently record the sins, doubts, embarrassments, and failures of their own heroes. David murders, Peter denies Christ, the apostles abandon Him, Abraham and Sarah doubt, Jonah runs, Noah becomes drunk, and Israel repeatedly rebels. These are not the kinds of carefully polished stories normally produced to glorify a nation, its leaders, or its founders. Scripture also preserves apparently incidental details that are difficult to explain as deliberate legendary embellishments.

    This episode begins a larger cumulative argument. No single evidence by itself establishes everything Christians believe about inspiration, but together these evidences provide substantial reasons for believing that the Scriptures are what they claim to be: the written Word of God.

    Get involved:
    Michael's public blog: https://credohouse.org
    Courses and Manuscript Reproductions from Michael and other scholars: https://credocourses.com
    Join us as we go through the great Fathers of the Faith in a year: https://throughthechurchfathers.com
    Support Michael and receive exclusive podcasts, courses, and much more: https://patreon.com/cmichaelpatton
    Mehr anzeigen Weniger anzeigen
    Weniger als 1 Minute
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
Noch keine Rezensionen vorhanden