The cellphones don't lie — even when the people do. This week on Hung, Maryn and Christie dig into days 5-7 of the Kouri Richens trial, where drug deals, secret devices, and a whole lot of deleted texts start painting a picture nobody can ignore.

Plus, Maryn's unforgettable ride-along with a stranger on the FrontRunner.

**Though not explicit, this podcast explores mature themes. Listener discretion is advised.**

In Part 2 of the Kouri Richins case, Christie walks us through the crime scene investigation — 11 search warrants, a 3D scan of the house, and a suspicious pill bottle that mysteriously never made it to the lab. Then things get really interesting. Meet Carmen: the housekeeper who bought drugs for Kouri on multiple occasions, with a colorful past, an immunity deal, and a bombshell detail about a very specific drug request.

How credible is Carmen’s testimony? And what does Kouri’s courtroom reaction say about whether she’s hearing the truth — or a lie?

**Though not explicit, this podcast explores mature themes. Listener discretion is advised.**

She called 911 at 3 AM. Her husband was dead. She was already making plans.

Kouri Richins had a boyfriend, $4.5 million in debt, and a dream of running an event center — with someone who wasn't Eric. Then her husband turned up dead of a fentanyl overdose five times the lethal dose.

Christie breaks down the trial. Maryn brings the receipts. Was Kouri a witch, or just a widow?

**Though not explicit, this podcast explores mature themes. Listener discretion is advised.**

Russ Faria is out of prison — and that's a problem for someone who'd rather the case stay closed. In this finale, Christie learns what happened next, and it's somehow worse than everything that came before. Someone crossed a line that can't be uncrossed, the walls finally started closing in, and a few people in the justice system got exactly what they deserved. There's also a surprising silver lining buried in all the wreckage.

Hung is a true crime podcast where a mother and daughter work through cases from the court of law to the court of public opinion — and sometimes have to re-record everything because technology is the real criminal...

**Though not explicit, this podcast explores mature themes. Listener discretion is advised.**

In this episode, Maryn walks Christie through everything that happened after Russ Faria's guilty verdict in 2013 — and Christie's reaction says it all. A second trial, a surprise DVD of 132 missing photos, a life insurance policy no jury was ever allowed to hear about, and a series of increasingly suspicious stories from someone who was never even charged. If you thought the first trial was frustrating, buckle up.

**Though not explicit, this podcast explores mature themes. Listener discretion is advised.**

In episode 4 of the Faria case, the defense finally gets their turn — and they've got a firefighter, four alibis, a Jack in the Box receipt, and a very suspicious ringtone. Christie and Maryn break down the witness parade in the Russ Faria case, where the real question isn't just what happened to Betsy — it's whether six people watching Conan the Barbarian can save a man's life. And then there's the state's closing argument, where they introduce their boldest theory yet: Russ Faria carried out a near-perfect murder — and only slipped up because of his slippers. Christie and Maryn have thoughts. Many thoughts.

In Part 3 of the Russ Faria case, Christie digs into Russ’s own words from a grueling 12-hour police interview — a suspicious string of gas station stops, bloody slippers, and a phone that went quiet for three hours. Russ says he was at game night. The detective says his alibi checks out — mostly. So why do they keep asking questions? Plus: what was Betsy’s good news, and why did Russ call the insurance company four days after her death? The state rests. But the questions are just getting started.

Maryn and Christie break down Russ Faria's haunting 911 call, then walk through the first responders and forensic experts who took the stand — including a medic who immediately called it homicide, suspicious bloody slippers with no matching footprints, and a "paw print" that may or may not be blood.

The evidence is piling up. But is it pointing at the right person?