Send us Fan Mail

In this Rapid Fire Q&A, the KILO Crew works through a wide range of programming questions that all point back to the same coaching responsibility: selecting the right tool for the trainee, the phase, and the training environment.

The episode opens with step loading for specialty squats and deadlifts in the B Series. Stéphane and Pauric explain why heavy standalone multi-joint lifts often need to be treated more like primary exercises, including the need for additional warm-up sets when the loading demands change significantly.

They also cover ankle mobility, why frequency and joint mechanics need to be considered beyond loaded stretching, and when a lat pulldown is a better starting point than the chin-up progression. For novice trainees, the priority is building upper-back strength, elbow flexor strength, torso control, work capacity, and an improved strength-to-bodyweight ratio before dedicating a large portion of the session to chin-up-specific work.

Additional questions include incline bench angles within the 90° principle, structuring two strength days around CrossFit, keeping higher-repetition assistance work in a novice fat-loss phase, selecting performance markers for defensive linemen, and choosing pressing variations for trainees with limited overhead mobility.

The episode closes with a direct discussion of speed, agility, and quickness drills. The crew separates quick feet from true quickness, explains the roles of reaction time and maximal strength, and questions training methods that cannot be measured or transferred clearly to sport.

Choose the right tool for the athlete in front of you.

00:00 Intro and rapid fire Q&A setup

00:19 Step loading vs constant loading for specialty squats and deadlifts

08:19 Improving ankle mobility beyond calf raise holds

10:44 Lat pulldown vs chin up progression for new clients

20:45 Choosing incline bench angle with the 90 degree principle

24:32 Programming strength days around CrossFit training

30:10 Rep schemes for assistance work in a novice fat loss phase

34:15 Indicator lifts for defensive linemen

39:02 Alternatives to overhead press for limited shoulder mobility

42:11 The value of SAQ and quickness training drills

Stay Connected with KILO:

Have a question? ⁠Submit it for a Rapid Fire episode⁠.

Learn more at ⁠trainkilo.com⁠

Follow KILO on ⁠Instagram⁠ and ⁠YouTube⁠.

Send us Fan Mail

Coaches often use “strength training” as though it describes one objective. In practice, the training required to build greater force potential is not the same as the training used to express that potential at the highest possible level.

In this episode, the KILO Crew breaks down the difference between building strength and displaying strength through the principles of program design, periodization, intensity, volume, neural adaptation, and fatigue management.

They explain why many classic strength-building rep schemes fall between 80-90% of 1RM, with enough volume to develop both neural qualities and muscular cross-sectional area. They then examine what changes when the goal becomes strength expression: higher average intensities, lower total volume, greater specificity, and enough fatigue reduction for fitness to become visible.

The discussion covers the fitness-fatigue paradigm, step loading, standard versus complex rep schemes, rate coding, motor unit recruitment, disinhibition, and the recurring 40% reduction in volume seen across deloads and peaking strategies.

The crew also explains why hypertrophy phases, lower-intensity training, exercise selection, and multi-joint skill development remain essential to long-term strength development. Machines can help build the muscular qualities that support a lift, but coaches must still train the movement through which strength will eventually be displayed.

The question is not simply how heavy the program looks. It is whether the current phase is designed to create more strength potential or reveal the strength that has already been built.

Build the quality first. Display it when the timing is right.

0:00 Intro building strength vs displaying strength
0:38 Defining building strength
2:22 Defining displaying strength
3:00 The fitness fatigue paradigm
3:51 Program design and periodization frequency
6:03 Rep scheme trends for building strength
9:42 Loading strategies for building strength
13:44 Rep scheme trends for displaying strength
24:56 Hypertrophy vs strength development
29:11 Intramuscular vs intermuscular coordination
34:52 Volume limits for strength training
37:57 Why the 70 to 80% zone matters
40:46 Long term periodization models
45:19 Outro and resources

Stay Connected with KILO:

Have a question? ⁠Submit it for a Rapid Fire episode⁠.

Learn more at ⁠trainkilo.com⁠

Follow KILO on ⁠Instagram⁠ and ⁠YouTube⁠.

Send us Fan Mail

How should coaches load giant sets, tri-sets, and advanced German Body Composition methods when fatigue begins to accumulate? The answer starts with understanding what the method is designed to develop.

Submit your questions https://form.typeform.com/to/R7JfaTZS

In this Rapid Fire Q&A, the KILO Crew explains why metabolic hypertrophy methods should initially be loaded around maintaining the prescribed repetitions and total time under tension. When coaches prioritize load too early, repetition quality and training duration fall, changing the adaptation the session was written to produce.

The discussion then moves into transition phases and active recovery training, including how coaches can bridge the gap between complete rest and productive training without creating unnecessary fatigue.

The Crew also presents a progression for eccentric training methods based on a client’s exposure, training age, and the specific response being developed. Extended eccentrics, accentuated eccentrics, concentric-eccentric combinations, and eccentric-only work each have a place, but personal preference is not a programming framework.

Additional questions cover how the intensity spread of step loading changes as set volume increases, how to structure a three-day fat-loss program, and when the bent-over barbell row fits better than supported rowing variations.

This episode is about selecting and loading training methods according to their purpose, the trainee’s current level, and the structure of the complete program.

Program the adaptation you are trying to build.

0:00 Introduction and rapid fire Q&A kickoff

0:19 Loading strategies for giant sets and tri-sets

1:22 Neural hypertrophy vs metabolic hypertrophy

2:31 Why undershooting load matters early on

5:16 Progressing load as work capacity improves

7:47 Cellular efficiency and time under tension

14:12 Regular GBC vs advanced GBC

17:00 Transition phases explained

19:40 Active recovery weeks and vacation training

21:22 Choosing eccentric methods for clients

26:02 Coaching based on client needs, not personal preference

29:32 Spotting technique and safety

31:32 Step loading percentage ranges

38:24 Structuring training weeks for fat loss clients

44:56 Why barbell bent over row isn't a bigger staple

Stay Connected with KILO:

Have a question? ⁠Submit it for a Rapid Fire episode⁠.

Learn more at ⁠trainkilo.com⁠

Follow KILO on ⁠Instagram⁠ and ⁠YouTube⁠.