August brought more government UAP material — and some of David Grusch’s most specific claims yet.

Stu and Neil examine Grusch’s claim that he has seen photographs and video relating to an alleged crash-retrieval programme, alongside his new estimate of more than 25 but fewer than 100 supposedly recovered vehicles.

But August also brought an almost perfect counterpoint: researchers examining all 112 publicly released PURSUE sensor videos found that none contains the complete information needed to calculate an object’s physical speed reliably.

Also discussed are new UAP NDA-reporting guidance, PURSUE Release Five, Robert Bigelow’s claimed Oval Office briefing, European UAP monitoring, the latest Gallup polling, competing interpretations of PR043 and new Air Force material entering the National Archives.

More claims. More files. But how much can we actually test?

Contact: AliensExplored@gmail.com

Two researchers have systematically analysed all 112 sensor videos released through the US government's PURSUE UAP programme — and their work raises a fundamental question about what those videos can actually establish.

In this solo Aliens Explored episode, Stu examines the new scientific preprint from Jacob Haqq-Misra and Ravi Kopparapu, including PR113, where the available information permits physical scenarios ranging from a small nearby object to something much larger travelling at extraordinary speed.

We also look at PR149, the importance of distance and camera geometry, and why the additional telemetry contained in the famous GOFAST footage makes such a difference to scientific analysis.

The original video version contains the sensor footage and diagrams discussed, but the central argument is equally important in audio: when we watch something moving rapidly across a screen, how much do we really know about how fast it was moving in the real world?

Contact: AliensExplored@gmail.com

In 1969, Virgo Mitt was digging a well beneath his garden in Merivälja, Tallinn, when he reportedly encountered an extraordinarily hard metallic layer. The fragments he removed would become part of a mystery involving Soviet scientists, military interest and claims of something much larger beneath the property.

In this solo episode, Stu examines Object M and asks what the evidence really supports. A sample associated with the original discovery was analysed in 2017 and identified as likely human-made ferrochrome — but researchers could not be certain that it actually came from Mitt's original find.

So does that solve the mystery, or merely identify one particular piece of metal?

With renewed interest in Object M and the possibility of a modern ground-penetrating-radar survey, this remains a surprisingly testable UFO case.

Question of the Week: Is Object M effectively solved, or would you still want the garden properly scanned before closing the case?

Contact: AliensExplored@gmail.com