Ep 3: The First Expert Call | Building an Ethical, Efficient Medical-Legal Collaboration Titelbild

Ep 3: The First Expert Call | Building an Ethical, Efficient Medical-Legal Collaboration

Ep 3: The First Expert Call | Building an Ethical, Efficient Medical-Legal Collaboration

Jetzt kostenlos hören, ohne Abo

Details anzeigen

Episode 3: The First Expert Call - Building an Ethical, Efficient Medical-Legal Collaboration.

Most expert engagements that go wrong were set up wrong on the first call. In this episode I walk through how attorneys and medical experts should run that first conversation: defining the role before discussing the merits, matching the assignment to the expert's actual qualifications, raising conflicts and compensation up front, presenting the case without announcing the answer, being honest about missing records, and putting the agreement in writing. Plus a real example of an expert who re-reviewed a case after the theory changed, never discussed the extra hours, and is still chasing that invoice.

Before your next first call, write down five things: the role, the clinical questions, the records, the boundaries, and the next decision point.

This is educational guidance, not legal advice. Engagement, privilege and disclosure rules vary by jurisdiction; confirm the details for your matter with qualified counsel.

For clinicians who want to do medical-legal work properly, start with the Expert Report Starter Kit: https://nationalexpertacademy.com

Med Legal Pro matches, screens and trains the medical experts attorneys rely on in personal injury, nursing home and wrongful death litigation: https://medlegalpro.com

Hosted by Tracy Liberatore, Esq. (PA, Emeritus).

Access Conflict Pro here

Produced by APodcastGeek
https://apodcastgeek.com/

adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
Noch keine Rezensionen vorhanden