Water Cooler Justice Titelbild

Water Cooler Justice

Water Cooler Justice

Von: Chris Robertson
Jetzt kostenlos hören, ohne Abo

Nur 0,99 € pro Monat für die ersten 3 Monate

Danach 9.95 € pro Monat. Bedingungen gelten.

Über diesen Titel

Employment lawyer, Chris Robertson and a rotation of special guests dissect stories of workplace drama and determine a fair outcome. The arguments and chatter may be juicier than the stories themselves. We hope you find these conversations entertaining, informative, and indulgent.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Chris Robertson
Erfolg im Beruf Management & Leadership Sozialwissenschaften Ökonomie
  • Chan v. NYX Capital Corp with Ellen Low and Matthew Dewar
    Oct 14 2025

    Ellen Low and Matthew Dewar join Chris Robertson and Sarah Goodenough to discuss Chan v. NYX Capital Corp. This case explores the limits of probationary employment and what happens when employers attempt to contract out of the Employment Standards Act. The panel dives into the meaning and implications of the phrase “at any time for any reason” in termination clauses, and why small drafting choices can make or break enforceability. With a mix of humour and technical insight, they reveal how two simple words, “legally permissible”, might be the key to getting it right.


    Is there a case you'd like to hear us talk about? Do you have a story you'd like to share with our panel? Reach out to us at: watercoolerjustice@gmail.com

    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    Mehr anzeigen Weniger anzeigen
    42 Min.
  • Kondaj v. Crossbridge with Barry Fisher and Robert Richler
    Sep 9 2025

    "The toughest cases in the world to predict the outcome are short service people. There’s no other word for it, they’re just a complete and utter mess." Barry Fisher and Robert Richler join Chris Robertson to discuss Kondaj v. Crossbridge Condominiums. In this episode, the panel unpacks the complexities of determining reasonable notice for short-service employees and explores whether notice functions as an objective calculation, a bridge to re-employment, or simply a judicial “crapshoot.”



    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    Mehr anzeigen Weniger anzeigen
    46 Min.
  • Preston v. Cervus Equipment Corporation and Bertsch vs. Datastealth Inc. with Matthew Fisher and Matthew Certosimo
    Apr 23 2025

    "We have put all this work in and none of it will matter if the decimal is in the wrong place, or the release has two extra words we didn't notice." Matthew Fisher and Matthew Certosimo join Chris Robertson and Sarah Goodenough to discuss Preston v. Cervus Equipment Corporation and Bertsch v. Datastealth Inc. The common theme in these two cases is that employment law is not as unfair to employers as it is often alleged. It is, rather, a heavily technical process for both sides. Both these cases show that the devil is truly in the details.


    Is there a case you'd like to hear us talk about? Do you have a story you'd like to share with our panel? Reach out to us at: watercoolerjustice@gmail.com

    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    Mehr anzeigen Weniger anzeigen
    39 Min.
Noch keine Rezensionen vorhanden