Understanding Your Partner Doesn’t Mean Agreeing With Them
Artikel konnten nicht hinzugefügt werden
Der Titel konnte nicht zum Warenkorb hinzugefügt werden.
Der Titel konnte nicht zum Merkzettel hinzugefügt werden.
„Von Wunschzettel entfernen“ fehlgeschlagen.
„Podcast folgen“ fehlgeschlagen
„Podcast nicht mehr folgen“ fehlgeschlagen
-
Gesprochen von:
-
Von:
Über diesen Titel
This week, I'm sharing how compassionate curiosity turns conflict into connection and why understanding your partner does not require you to agree. Practical scripts, clear definitions, and real examples show how to stay on the same team while holding different views.
• use post‑Valentine’s expectations and disappointment as a chance to communicate
• compassionate curiosity as the path to intimate friendship and passionate partnership
• difference between understanding and agreement
• story of taking a friend’s side and how stance changes feedback
• faith shift case study and fear of being “tainted” by new views
• ping pong versus softball dialogue and why pacing matters
• both‑and language with sample phrases and questions
• applying the tools to money, parenting, sex, and tech boundaries
• building safety, respect and teamwork without forced consensus
Make sure that if this episode was helpful, you share it with a friend or leave a review.
Send a text
