Jess Lowry on the Fourth Industrial Revolution, why design keeps getting locked out of the rooms where AI is being built, and what diversity of thinking actually looks like on a team that wants to win.

ess Lowry expected to be excited about AI. After almost twenty years in UX, service design, and platform orchestration, she figured this was the moment design got to do its best work. Then she walked into the rooms where AI was actually being built and realized something had shifted. The data scientists were there. The researchers were there. The product managers were there. She was not.

This week, Brian and Eve sit down with Jess to investigate what's actually happening to design in the middle of what she calls the Fourth Industrial Revolution. The "seat at the table" conversation was already dated when she started in tech in the early 2000s. The story underneath it is bigger, more structural, and far less discussed in public. Smart homes, smart cars, smart cities, and AI agents are being wired together by teams that mostly aren't talking to each other, inside companies siloed by budget line, and shipped fast because building has gotten cheap. What hasn't gotten cheap is critical thinking, long-term planning, and the human-centered eye that catches the things everyone else misses.

Jess makes a clear case for where design fits in. Not as a slowdown, not as a polish layer, but as the connector that externalizes shared understanding so teams can move quickly without backing themselves into corners. She walks through the Bauhaus and arts and crafts roots of design thinking, the 10x to 100x ROI of catching problems before engineering starts, and what diversity of thinking actually looks like on a team that wants to win.

Brian shares his Starbucks and ChatGPT experiment, where he got the agent to design a drink optimized to punish baristas, and the three of them work through what it means when governance is just a few keyword filters and the edge cases nobody mapped become the product.

The conversation also looks forward. Jess wants a web that finally catches up to the Bauhaus, immersive environments that bring sound and light and scent into digital space, and data centers reimagined as paths into nature rather than scars across it. Brian and Eve land on a Star Trek future where AI handles food, energy, and the climate crisis first, and the rest of us get to self-actualize.

If you've felt locked out of the rooms where the future is being built, this one's for you. And if you're hiring, deciding, or quietly running the team that's about to ship the next AI feature, Jess has a question for you: how many opportunities to win are you actually creating?

Six tech companies. Two weeks. One playbook.

Brian and Eve walk through the lawsuits, settlements, and corporate meltdowns piling up across the tech industry, and trace the single defense strategy connecting all of them. OpenAI is named in three separate legal actions in six days, including a wrongful death suit over the F S U mass shooting and a wrongful death suit over a college student's overdose. Pennsylvania sues Character dot A I after a chatbot claimed a fake medical license. Meta threatens to pull out of New Mexico rather than redesign for child safety. Apple pays 250 million dollars to settle a class action over Siri features it advertised but never shipped. And GameStop C E O Ryan Cohen tries to buy eBay, can't explain the math on live television, and gets rejected.

The through-line: ship fast, monetize the harm, settle the bodies, update the disclaimer, and tell the next user this version is different.

Related listening: attorney Bakari Sellers, who represents the Chabba family in the F S U shooting lawsuit against OpenAI, in his own words: https://youtu.be/J6_6vluYNVc

Sources cited in this episode: NBC News, CBS News, Yahoo Finance, NPR, CNBC, MacRumors, and the SEC Form 8-K filing from eBay Inc.

Hosted by Brian J. Crowley & Eve Eden / Edited by Kelsey Smith / Intro Animation & Logo Design by Brian J. Crowley / Music by Nicolas Lee / A joint production of EVE | User Experience Design Agency and CrowleyUX | Where Systems Meet Stories / ©2025 Brian J. Crowley and Eve Eden / questions@UXmurdermystery.com / "Thank you for watching and or listening!"

For informational and entertainment purposes only. Views are commentary and speculation, not statements of fact. Discussions of real companies and individuals use publicly available information for critique and education. Not factual assertions about motives or intentions. Creators disclaim liability for damages from reliance on content. Events may be dramatized for illustrative purposes.

podscan_v9DZhMTHbaN9cVQFqN1dyKq5JUJd6mep

Somewhere on Reddit, a designer just spent five hours on a take-home assignment and got a form rejection. The field isn't dying in one place. It's bleeding out across the whole map.

Brian Crowley and Eve Eden answer the questions UX practitioners are actually asking right now. Not the ones recruiters answer at conferences. The ones people post anonymously at midnight after their fourth interview round goes silent.

The case files: the AI bubble designers keep getting blamed for, and the April 2026 Axios finding that AI-enabled workflows can now cost more than the human labor they replaced. The four-year client relationship that ended when a designer was swapped for Claude. Hiring processes that ask for five hours of work and return template rejections. The box within a box problem in current AI interfaces. Whether the field needs licensing. And the Reddit question Brian and Eve don't dodge: is UX design just psychological manipulation with a nicer name.

If you have been ghosted, force-prompted into AI workflows you did not ask for, or laid off in the last eighteen months, this is the episode where someone says the quiet part out loud.

Send your case: questions@uxmurdermystery.com