“Passenger rail is dead” gets thrown around like it’s a fact, but the ridership numbers keep refusing to cooperate. We zoom out to Amtrak’s systemwide performance first, including record highs of 32.8 million rides in FY24 and 34.5 million trips in FY25, then we go route-by-route to see what happens when new service meets real demand.

We break down five recent Amtrak projects and compare early ridership to the projections that justified each launch. The Ethan Allen Express extension to Burlington shows how a simple 68-mile extension on existing track can produce a meaningful jump and hold it over time. The Mardi Gras Service between Mobile and New Orleans looks like a genuine breakout, blowing past its annual estimate in about six months while delivering strong customer satisfaction and enough demand that trains can sell out. Not every pilot shines though: the Berkshire Flyer’s seasonal tourism model struggles with low and declining ridership, while the Valley Flyer appears to be a quieter success as it recovers from the COVID shock and inches toward its original target.

Our biggest “wow” moment is the Borealis from Chicago to St. Paul, which beats its long-range forecast quickly and helps drive massive growth in the broader corridor. That success also points to the next problem: if demand is there, can we actually add frequency when there’s a multi-year backlog for trainsets? We close by kicking around a practical bridge solution while rail capacity catches up: better regional bus connections and how Amtrak already plays a bigger role in bus service than many people realize.

Subscribe for more transit deep dives, share this with a friend who still thinks nobody rides trains, and leave a review if you want more data-driven route breakdowns. What corridor should we analyze next?

Send us Fan Mail

Support the show

Pittsburgh doesn’t usually come to mind as a “big transit city,” but once you look closely, it has some of the most practical and inventive transit infrastructure in the U.S. We dig into how Pittsburgh’s hills, rivers, and industrial rail legacy shaped a network that still punches above its weight, and why a brand new Bus Rapid Transit line to Oakland and the universities could be a major quality-of-life upgrade.

We start by walking through Pittsburgh’s light rail: the Red, Blue, and Silver lines, their frequencies, and the odd-but-fascinating detail that some segments operate with request stops like a bus. From there we get into the real story behind the system, including how old railway tunnels and former streetcar rights of way still carry riders today, plus the downside of aging infrastructure and vehicles. We also talk transit-oriented development, because when we see station-area parking lots, we see real potential for more housing and better neighborhoods.

Then we switch to what might be Pittsburgh’s secret weapon: the busways. These grade-separated corridors let tons of local bus routes funnel into a fast, reliable approach to downtown, more like a bus highway than a simple painted lane. Finally, we break down the University Line BRT scheduled for 2027, including dedicated lanes, upgraded signals, all-door boarding, new stations, and why the $291M price tag is more than “just paint.”

If you enjoy smart transit planning, Pittsburgh transit, bus rapid transit, and real-world tradeoffs between BRT and rail, subscribe for more, share this with a friend who loves cities, and leave a review with the next city you want us to cover.

Send a text

Support the show

A strange transit showdown is brewing in Berlin: build a practical tram that stitches together everyday trips, or elevate a sleek maglev that sprints between a handful of stations. Louis spent the day on the ground from Spandau to the former Tegel Airport, walking the corridors, riding the buses, and mapping where people actually live, work, and wait. What he found is a city on the cusp of major growth with Urban Tech Republic rising at TXL and a vast new neighborhood at Gartenfeld, while current buses already strain under midday crowds.

Politics heats the debate, CDU and AfD push maglev, while SPD, the Left, and Greens favor the tram. The tram comes in around €120 million with strong federal co-funding; the maglev is already spending €80 million on a study and test track, with line estimates of €300–500 million and fuzzier funding. We also revisit Berlin’s brief M-Bahn maglev from 1989–91, and consider a gondola wildcard: useful in spots, but not a backbone for Spandau’s all-day demand.

If the story resonates, subscribe, share with a transit-minded friend, and leave a review—your support helps us bring more on-the-ground reporting to your feed.

Send us Fan Mail

Support the show