The Sophists: Fifth Century Enlightenment? | Ep. 5 Pt.1 Titelbild

The Sophists: Fifth Century Enlightenment? | Ep. 5 Pt.1

The Sophists: Fifth Century Enlightenment? | Ep. 5 Pt.1

Jetzt kostenlos hören, ohne Abo

Details anzeigen

Über diesen Titel

 About This EpisodeIn this episode of Notions of Progress — the first of a two-part solo series — we ask a deceptively simple question: were the ancient Greek Sophists the original enlightenment-like thinkers of human progress? These were the famous and sought-after educators of fifth-century Athens. They charged fees, itinerant, and claimed that human excellence could be developed, not just inherited. For that, they were called sophists — a word that still, today,carries a negative connotation.Drawing on W.K.C. Guthrie’s A History of Greek Philosophy, Rachel Barney’s scholarship on technê and Sophistic thought, Joshua Billings’ work on the fifth-century enlightenment, and the authentic fragments of Protagoras himself, this episode examines whether the Sophists represent a genuine ‘enlightenment’ movement — one defined by empirical inquiry and skepticism toward inherited authority, and a theory of civilizational progress through techne,teachable skills.The episode includes five key Greek terms that carry the conceptual weight of the Sophists’ argument, profiles the four major figures of the movement, and closes with Protagoras’s great myth of human origins from Plato’s Protagoras.Five Important Terms Sophistês (so-fis-TAYS): Literally “one who makes people wise.” A professional teacher of practical wisdom and civic skill in 5th-century Athens. Technê (tek-NAY): A Greek word with no exact English equivalent. It equates to systematic, teachable skills — but more than technique. Technê transforms its practitioner. The Sophists believed technê was a key driver of human progress.Aretê (ah-reh-TAY): Excellence, or virtue. For the Sophists, aretê was not a fixed gift of birth or divine favor — it was something that could be taught. Nomos (NOH-moss): Law, custom, convention. What human beings have established through agreement and institutions. Physis (FEW-sis): Nature, or natural reality. The tension between nomos and physis — between convention and nature — is one of the defining intellectual controversies of the fifth century as it informed one’s belief in acquired vs inherited powerMajor ThemesHow the word “sophist” went from a term of respect to an insult, and why it matters for reading the historical recordGeorge Grote’s 19th-century rehabilitation of the Sophists, and Eduard Zeller’s influential counter-verdict — a scholarly debate that still shapes how ancient philosophy is taughtJoshua Billings on the fifth-century enlightenment: three characteristic modes of Sophistic thought — empirical research, arguing both sides, and critical reasoning about divine causalityThe four major figures: Protagoras, Gorgias, Prodicus, and Hippias — what distinguished each of them and what they sharedProtagoras’s great myth from the Protagoras dialogue: a three-stage narrative of human progress from vulnerable animals to skilled craftsmen to citizens capable of governing themselvesWhether the Sophists represent the first systematic theory of progress through human agency — and what that question means for the larger arc of this podcastFascinating Historical InsightsAristophanes’ The Clouds as hostile source materialThe earliest surviving satire of Sophistic teaching is not a philosophical argument — it’s a comedy. In The Clouds (423 BCE), Aristophanes portrays Socrates running a “Thinkery” where students learn to make the weaker argument defeat the stronger. Scholars like W.K.C. Guthrie treat this as evidence of public anxiety about Sophistic education, not as an accurate description of what the Sophists actually taught.Protagoras was reportedly tried, banished, and his books burned in the Athenian agora. He was tried for impiety, expelled from Athens, and — according to ancient sources — his books were gathered and burned publicly in the agora. The man who said human beings were “the measure of all things” was destroyed by the very democratic city that prided itself on open debate. His books have not survived.Plato may have built his philosophy in the shadow of Socrates’ death — and the Sophists were part of what he was reacting againstIn 399 BCE, a jury of 501 Athenian citizens voted to execute Socrates. Plato was in his late twenties and witnessed it. In The Open Society and Its Enemies (1945), Karl Popper argued that what followed was an act of intellectual betrayal: Plato, he wrote, was Socrates’ “most gifted disciple” who “was soon to prove the least faithful.” The jury that condemned Socrates was composed of precisely the kind of citizens the Sophists had spent decades empowering — ordinary Athenians. Whether this was a conscious act of revenge or something Plato could not fully acknowledge, Popper carefully stated “I cannot doubt the fact of Plato’s betrayal... But it is another question whether this attempt was conscious.” (The Open Society and Its Enemies, Vol. 1, Ch. 10, p. 194–195)Plato /...
Noch keine Rezensionen vorhanden