Australia’s system for deciding whether new health technologies are funded is too focused on contested models and not enough on real people and their needs. The lack of human consideration leads to long delays, avoidable suffering, and sometimes deaths, in a process where patient voices are 'summarised' into oblivion while insiders talk around the problem instead of fixing it quickly, openly, and based on our shared values.

Reflect on Susan Ley’s legacy as a former health minister, especially the 2015 PBS Access and Sustainability Package. She was treated rudely and unfairly, and that meaningful ecosystem reform has since stalled. Critique Senate Estimates, noting that departmental witnesses were evasive and overly defensive, with patients largely absent from the conversation. The discussion expands to reform and the lack of patient rights. Also note the troubling political rhetoric about medical information and regulation. Close by teasing upcoming upgrades to the BPD website.

Mark Butler’s four 'pillars' on medicines policy and the argument that Australia prioritises low prices over preventing shortages and ensuring access. Do we need smarter, targeted incentives to address shortages that often reflect global challenges? Is there a risk of 'process creep' that actually slows access? Aged-care reforms that unintentionally removed funding for dose administration aids and glucose monitoring.