Amy Worley is a seasoned executive and thought leader in cybersecurity, privacy, and AI governance. She is the Managing Director at BRG and leads its Privacy Compliance Advisory Practice. With a unique blend of legal, technical, and strategic expertise, Amy brings a multidimensional perspective to digital risk management and value creation.

Digital trust has become a commercial imperative. As companies move quickly to adopt new AI tools and systems, privacy, security, and governance efforts often remain fragmented. Teams continue to operate in silos, without a shared framework for managing data and AI across the business. Without governance and core privacy and security controls in place, AI initiatives are more likely to fail or create risk. So how can organizations move forward with AI while building digital trust?

The best path forward often starts with structure, not speed. Rather than jumping straight into new tools, organizations need to have clear processes in place before implementation. Developing a competitive advantage through the confidence by design framework means building evidence-based programs grounded in transparency, data minimization, and core privacy and security controls. Taking time upfront to anticipate where projects might fail can help teams scope governance work more effectively before moving forward.

In this episode of She Said Privacy/He Said Security, Jodi and Justin Daniels talk with Amy Worley, Managing Director and head of the Privacy Compliance Advisory Practice at BRG, about building digital trust by aligning privacy, security, and AI governance frameworks. She explores how organizations can integrate these disciplines into one unified approach rather than operating in silos. She shares insights from her book, The Confidence Advantage, and explains how evidence-based programs, metrics, and governance fit into the confidence by design approach. Amy also discusses why governance must precede companies' implementation of AI tools and offers practical ways to strengthen everyday privacy and security habits.

Steve Blair is the Senior Privacy and Security Test Program Leader at Consumer Reports, where he evaluates connected devices and digital products to uncover privacy and security risks. With a background spanning early internet technology, mobile hardware, and product security, he helps consumers better understand how their data is collected, used, and protected, especially in emerging technologies designed for families and children.

Connected devices designed for kids play a growing role in how families stay connected and informed. GPS trackers, smartwatches, and other apps and tools often promise safety and convenience, yet they also raise questions about how children's data is collected, used, stored, and protected. The challenge is not whether these tools function as intended, but how they handle personal information once they are in use. How can parents gain confidence in the technology their children use every day while avoiding privacy and security risks?

A practical starting point is to read privacy notices and product descriptions, then examine how devices and apps behave in practice. Reviewing default settings, questioning app permissions, and noting how easy privacy controls are to find can help parents manage risk and better understand how a company collects and handles kids' data. These considerations become especially important when children are required to use certain apps or connected devices to participate in school activities or other events.

In this episode of She Said Privacy/He Said Security, Jodi and Justin Daniels talk with Steve Blair, Senior Privacy and Security Test Program Leader at Consumer Reports, about privacy and security risks in kids' GPS trackers, wearables, and apps. Steve explains what Consumer Reports found when testing GPS trackers and wearables designed for children, and how hands-on testing helps parents better understand device privacy controls. He shares practical ways parents can assess app privacy and security protections, even without deep technical expertise. And Steve also shares practical privacy and security tips parents can use every day, like keeping devices updated, removing apps when they are no longer needed, and requesting data deletion when app use ends.

Ron De Jesus is the Field Chief Privacy Officer at Transcend, driving practical privacy governance and industry advocacy. He previously led privacy at Grindr, Tinder, and Match Group, built global programs at Tapestry and American Express, founded De Jesus Consulting, and remains an active community leader through the IAPP and LGBTQ Privacy & Tech Network.

Privacy professionals navigate a growing web of privacy regulations and emerging technologies, yet many still rely on manual processes to manage their programs. Teams might track global requirements in spreadsheets and manually triage privacy rights requests. To scale privacy programs effectively, teams need to move beyond manual approaches. So what should privacy teams consider as they adopt automated solutions?

The key to scaling privacy programs efficiently lies in embracing automation and technology that aligns with an organization's broader goals. When privacy leaders secure early buy-in from stakeholders, technology decisions are more likely to support the business beyond basic compliance needs. Teams also need clarity on what they are trying to accomplish, a thorough understanding of where their data lives, and time to evaluate how new tech fits into their existing systems and workflows. Sometimes teams expect third-party privacy tools to work out of the box and solve their compliance needs. However, that is often not the case, and why companies must review and test vendor tech solutions to ensure they accurately meet company requirements.

In this episode of She Said Privacy/He Said Security, Jodi and Justin Daniels talk with Ron De Jesus, Field Chief Privacy Officer at Transcend, about transitioning privacy programs from manual processes to automation. Ron emphasizes the importance of internal alignment when adopting privacy technology, discusses the risks of treating privacy tools as plug-and-play compliance solutions, and highlights the need for companies to review vendor tech solutions against their specific requirements and legal obligations. He also explains how the privacy community helps shape his view of how teams operationalize privacy in practice and shares his prediction for what's in store for privacy professionals in 2026.