RELIABILITY MENTORSHIP - THE SOLUTION FOR THE SKILLS GAP?
Artikel konnten nicht hinzugefügt werden
Der Titel konnte nicht zum Warenkorb hinzugefügt werden.
Der Titel konnte nicht zum Merkzettel hinzugefügt werden.
„Von Wunschzettel entfernen“ fehlgeschlagen.
„Podcast folgen“ fehlgeschlagen
„Podcast nicht mehr folgen“ fehlgeschlagen
-
Gesprochen von:
-
Von:
Über diesen Titel
Mentorship beats tools. Full stop.
I’ve been on the road with Maintain Reliability across food factories, metal plants and logistics sites, and the pattern is the same everywhere. Companies invest in systems before they invest in judgement. They gather more data before they build the confidence to act on what they already know. Then they wonder why the breakdowns keep coming.
The issue is rarely a lack of information. It’s a lack of guided decision making.
Training gives knowledge. Mentoring builds judgement. There’s a big difference. In a classroom everything makes sense. On a live plant with production breathing down your neck and budgets under pressure, it’s a different game. That’s where experience matters. Someone standing next to the engineer saying, focus here, not there. Fix this first. Leave that for now. Sequence it properly.
Order is everything in reliability.
Before we talk about monitoring strategies, we ask simple questions. Is planning and scheduling tight. Are critical assets clearly defined. Is lubrication consistent. Are work orders closed properly. Do people understand their roles. If those foundations are weak, adding more layers just increases confusion and backlog.
When the basics are strong, performance compounds.
A proper reliability audit is usually the turning point. Not a tick box exercise. A real look at how the plant operates. It exposes gaps in communication, spares, lubrication standards, ownership and accountability. More importantly, it gives leadership clarity. It turns reliability from a cost into a structured improvement plan.
Technology has its place. We use condition monitoring every day. But the team must own the data. They must understand what a trend means, what the risk is, and what action follows. Without that, nothing changes.
I’ve seen engineers with almost no budget transform a site because they closed the loop fast and acted decisively. I’ve also seen sites with serious investment still stuck reactive because culture didn’t support action.
Reliability works when people take ownership. When KPIs drive behaviour. When leaders back decisions. And when mentors hold the rope when pressure hits.
If you want results that last, start with an honest audit. Build a roadmap you can defend. Strengthen the people. Then layer in the systems.
That’s how we do it at Maintain Reliability.
Support the show
