Position To Win Titelbild

Position To Win

Position To Win

Von: John Luke Laube
Jetzt kostenlos hören, ohne Abo

Position to Win is for the challengers. Founders and CMOs who refuse to settle for second place.


This is a brand strategy podcast about the kind of strategy that actually moves a business. Which slot you own. Who you beat to own it. What your homepage, your sales call, and your investor one-pager have to say to back it up.


Every episode gives you two things. A tool you can use. And a sharper way to look at your own brand.

© 2026 Position To Win
Marketing & Vertrieb Ökonomie
  • Brand ICP
    Jun 17 2026

    Send us Fan Mail

    Ask a founder who their customer is and you'll get a category. Enterprise SaaS. Recreational cannabis. Health-conscious consumers. None of those is an ICP. They're hiding places.

    This episode is about the most underrated decision in brand strategy, and the one most companies fake. Ideal Customer Profile. We do it backwards. We start with who it isn't.

    It is easier to write down who you'd walk away from than to invent the perfect customer from a blank page. Most revenue leaders can list five customer types they'd refuse before they can name one they'd build a brand around. The negative list is where the conviction lives. The positive list is where teams hide the fact that they don't have one yet.

    I'll give you the framework I've used across cannabis, healthcare, real estate, CPG, and B2B. I call it the Five Filters. Category. Context. Lifestage or revenue band. Trigger. Psychographic. Five questions, each one screening the audience tighter than the last. Each one paired with its inverse, because the "not" half is the half that does the work.

    The two filters most teams skip are the two that decide everything. The trigger, what actually makes someone go looking. And the psychographic, the self-image your customer is buying into.

    Two case studies carry the episode.

    Knack, the New York cannabis brand my studio built. Grown in the Adirondacks, sold in New York dispensaries. Its customer is a New Yorker with identity-level pride who buys cannabis the way they buy a six-pack. A regular, confident choice. The name narrowed the audience after we landed on it, and that second pass is what made the voice work.

    Liquid Death, canned water with two words on the can that signal the opposite of everything else on the shelf. Its customer cares about plastic waste and refuses to look like a kid holding a water bottle at a show. Same category structure as Knack. Completely different ICP shape. Neither brand could have run the other's playbook.

    You'll also get the discovery method. Interview your ten best customers. Read the unfiltered language in your reviews, your support tickets, your sales calls. Watch what they buy alongside you. Then a one-hour exercise you can run on Monday. Fill in the Five Filters by hand. Write the inverse for each one. Read both lists out loud and watch who in the room flinches. The flinch is where your ICP is still contested inside your own company, and that contested space is what's bleeding your marketing budget.

    Borrowed wisdom from April Dunford's Obviously Awesome and the book the whole field stands on, Ries and Trout's Positioning.

    The takeaway is simple. If you can't describe your ICP in one paragraph, with a real "not for" list, that's the most valuable hour of work you'll do this quarter. Not a rebrand. Not a new website. The ICP.

    Choose who you're for. Write down who you're not for. Everything downstream, your name, voice, identity, packaging, pricing, the sales script, is a tactical answer to one strategic question.

    For whom?

    Mehr anzeigen Weniger anzeigen
    28 Min.
  • Brand Strategy
    Jun 9 2026

    Send us Fan Mail

    Most companies do not have a brand strategy.

    They have a list of activities.

    This episode is about the single mental habit that separates the two. Strategy is choice. Activity is addition. One closes doors. The other refuses to.

    We will cover the 200-page brand document that taught me what real strategy is not. The three "brand pillars" that could have been written for any competitor. And the question every strategist should ask before signing off on anything:

    What did we decide not to do?

    Plus the difference between a theme and a position. Why your brand pillars probably belong on your competitor's slide too. And what it actually costs you when you refuse to choose.

    A tool you can use. A sharper way to look at your own brand.

    Mehr anzeigen Weniger anzeigen
    24 Min.
  • Rock, Paper, Scissors
    Jun 9 2026

    Send us Fan Mail

    A simple model for understanding what kind of company you are right now. And who you can actually beat.

    Scissors is the startup. Sharp focus. One ICP. One edge. Rock is the proven system. Durable. Repeatable. Paper is the giant. Suite. Spend. Distribution.

    Each one beats a different opponent. And almost every founder picks the wrong fight.

    Scissors loses when it tries to act like Rock. Rock loses when it tries to act like Paper.

    The smartest competitive move is almost always behind you. Not ahead of you.

    TikTok cut Facebook. Google cut Yahoo. Zoom cut the suites. Three companies that won by staying sharp while their bigger opponents tried to do everything.

    A tool you can use. A sharper way to look at your own brand.

    Mehr anzeigen Weniger anzeigen
    12 Min.
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
Noch keine Rezensionen vorhanden