Oncology Unscripted With John Marshall Titelbild

Oncology Unscripted With John Marshall

Oncology Unscripted With John Marshall

Von: John Marshall
Jetzt kostenlos hören, ohne Abo

ZEITLICH BEGRENZTES ANGEBOT. Nur 0,99 € pro Monat für die ersten 3 Monate. 3 Monate für 0,99 €/Monat, danach 9,95 €/Monat. Bedingungen gelten. Jetzt starten.

Über diesen Titel

Oncology Unscripted with John Marshall, MD brings you a unique take on the latest oncology news including business news, gossip, science, and a special in-depth segment relevant to clinical practice. Sprachen lernen
  • Oncology Unscripted With John Marshall: Episode 22: ESMO, Efficiency, and Evidence: A Look Ahead at New Data and Important Updates
    Oct 14 2025
    [00:00:05] Main Topic ESMO, Efficiency, and Evidence: New Data, China’s Science Leap, and Leucovorin and Autism John Marshall, MD: Hey everybody, John Marshall from Oncology Unscripted. There is so much going on right now that we're gonna need a full hour-long show, but we're not gonna do that to you. We still promise short bites here and there of the stuff that's going on, just to make sure you're in the loop. I'm sure you are.But let's start with a little science. And the science we wanna focus on is the upcoming ESMO meeting. We've looked at the leading abstracts that are gonna be presented there, and there's not gonna be a lot of surprises about the content. There's a lot of innovation in precision medicine and immunotherapy and different diseases, and positive randomized trials, and some exciting early-phase clinical trials. But what I think is worth noting is that a pretty high percentage of the science that's being presented at ESMO actually comes from China—Chinese pharmaceutical companies sponsoring it, China's institutions running the clinical trials. And there's been a lot of discussion about the quality of Chinese data.Just recently, on September 23rd, Scott Gottlieb—who used to be, of course, the head of the FDA—did a very nice opinion piece in The Washington Post about the impact of Chinese drug development. The quality wasn't actually that bad—it was just less expensive. They were able to do clinical research much less expensively than we can here in Western society, if you will.So, it's not so much intellectual innovation—it's efficiency in getting answers out. His whole editorial is about: how do we reshape and reprioritize our own clinical research infrastructure? How does the opportunity of a, I don't know, a world turned upside down in terms of regulatory oversight, et cetera, give us a chance to maybe improve the process, to lower the cost of drug development, so that our innovation—which we really still remain the hub for—can actually be brought forward and not create some sort of global intellectual property war, which he refers to, but more: how do we keep up with the pricing structure and the innovations that are out there?So, I encourage you to not only look through the abstracts from ESMO—because there are some very important positive results from that—but also think a little bit about how we, in different parts of the world, even the playing field around the cost of new drug development. I encourage you to read that Scott Gottlieb Washington Post editorial.One of the big abstracts that will be presented is around MRD ctDNA testing and using that technology as a way to define who should receive adjuvant therapy and who should not. Of course, we are interviewing the lead author on that paper, so stick around for that interview. But we clearly can see that genetic testing may, in fact, have a major impact on making us more efficient on who should get adjuvant therapy and who should not.So, I do clearly think that's the evolution that's going forward. You wanna make sure to keep your finger on the pulse of MRD ctDNA testing in the decision-making process for adjuvant therapy and subsequent treatment.I'm lucky enough to be running a protocol here in the United States looking at MRD positivity in patients with colorectal cancer, and others are doing it in other diseases.One of the ways that could, in fact, make that much less expensive is digital pathology. Because it turns out that a digital image of an H&E slide—and there's some fascinating data around this—can actually predict risk almost as well as genetic testing. So, that's very inexpensive. It takes 20 minutes to scan it in, send it off to the computer, AI reads it back, and gives you a risk factor.So, I do want you to also keep a nose out for digital pathology as an impact.But maybe the most unsettled science that I saw in the last week actually was also in The Washington Post. Now, The Washington Post, in one issue, reported on vaccines killing children, our administration down the street is going to be talking about how evil vaccines are—continuing that discussion that their rising costs are gonna break us in the U.S. Our economy is so built around healthcare that the rising costs are eventually gonna break it. And the risk is that what I'm saying right now might land me in the same boat as Jimmy Kimmel—of getting fired. But you know, last night he was back on again. So maybe that will only be temporary. But the science I wanna talk about is this whole connection between, say, Tylenol—acetaminophen—and autism. And the only reason it says “Tylenol” is that Donald Trump can't say the word “acetaminophen.” And so many people out there are affected with autism over many, many decades—even well before Tylenol/acetaminophen was invented. But what really caught my eye is these smaller studies that have suggested that leucovorin—which is folinic acid, okay? It’s reduced folic ...
    Mehr anzeigen Weniger anzeigen
    33 Min.
  • Oncology Unscripted With John Marshall: Episode 21: Watching Vaccine Access Collapse in Real Time
    Sep 16 2025
    [00:00:05] MedBuzz: Back to Being ‘Just a Doctor’John Marshall, MD: John Marshall for Oncology Unscripted, coming to you live from this big office. This is the biggest office because, you know, I've been the Chief of the Division here at Georgetown for 20 years. I didn't want the job when I was first offered it a long time ago. I ended up saying yes. Of course, that's a dramatic change in one's academic career—taking on administrative roles like this. You do get the big office, which is nice, but you also get a lot of other stuff. You know too much. You know who's mad at whom, you know who you need to recruit, and who you need to un-recruit—all of those things. You have the business side of a cancer business going on, and you're a doctor, and you're doing clinical research, and you're trying to educate everybody around you.About a year or so ago, I decided in my own head that 20 years is enough. And so, as of this summer, I have officially stepped down as the Chief of the Division here at Georgetown. My colleague and much smarter friend, Dr. Steven Liu—lung cancer expert, world expert—is stepping in to be the Chief of our Division, and he's already hit the ground running. The fresh voice is honestly already a positive. You can just hear the freshness of his voice and his attitude and his energy. You know, the Mayo Clinic actually has a structure where you can only be in a leadership position for so many years, and it has to turn over. And I really like that. It's sort of like what we hope our presidential terms will be. But who knows—that may change. But there's a limit: you do the job for a certain period of time, and then someone else steps in and gives you that fresh voice and fresh perspective. But that's not the traditional way of doing it. Most of the time, people hold on to their position as long as they can hold on to it, until they can't do it anymore or they decide to go to some other institution.But the reason I'm sharing this is that I'm now in this sort of weird new place. I'm an ordinary staff physician. All of a sudden—yep. I have my patients, I'm doing my thing, I'm putting people on clinical trials, I'm educating the brand-new fellows who just showed up here about a month ago. Great fun having brand-new fellows 'cause they don't even know how to spell 5-FU, much less how well it works, how it works, and the side effects, etc. So, I love the first few months 'cause you're teaching people a lot of new things that they need to know. But anyway, that part's very exciting. So, I'm still doing all of that.But what I'm gonna have to get used to is not knowing everything—also not feeling responsible for everything. And that's gonna be a change for me. So, any of you out there who've either been through that transition or who maybe wanna offer me some therapy—I'm in line for some therapy as I transition, as I begin to slow down my academic career, withdrawing as the Chief of the Division, but still doing my day-to-day job and still trying to cure cancer.Take care of each other out there. Take care of your bosses and those leaders. It's not a great, fun job. But also, remember: those of us who are now back in the trenches—we need to take care of each other as well. John Marshall for Oncology Unscripted.[00:03:35] Editorial: Watching Vaccine Access Collapse In Real TimeJohn Marshall, MD: John Marshall Oncology Unscripted. First piece of advice: don’t read the newspaper. Second piece of advice: don’t watch C-SPAN, for sure. Just yesterday on C-SPAN was the big congressional hearings. I did read the summary of it in The Washington Post, where RFK Jr. was interviewed—cross-examined for three hours by both sides of the aisle—about what he has been doing with the CDC. And I think we all, as medical professionals, need to take a big step back and a pause and sort of ask: what the hell is going on?You know, the specifics first. He fired everybody at the CDC. He has hired new people at the CDC. They have not come forward with any formal vaccine recommendations. This is all about vaccines and the like.Yesterday in clinic, a patient of mine—who would be a candidate for both flu and COVID vaccines, who could have, a month ago, walked into CVS and gotten both of those injections—now, in the state of Virginia (and I think there are about 14 other states where this is true), has to have a prescription. This came out from CVS and Walgreens—that you have to write a prescription. Physicians have to write a prescription so that patients can take it to the CVS and Walgreens to get their vaccines. Some states are not providing them at all. Some states have gone the other way, where they’ve formed collaborations—and this is those cool West Coast states: Washington, Oregon, Hawaii, California. They’ve formed a consortium to say, “We are gonna set our own policy,” because the government’s policy right now is up in the air about whether you can get access to them, whether...
    Mehr anzeigen Weniger anzeigen
    20 Min.
  • Oncology Unscripted With John Marshall: Episode 20: Why Are More Healthy Young Adults Getting GI Cancer?
    Aug 20 2025
    Why Are More Healthy Young Adults Getting GI Cancer?[00:05]John Marshall, MD:John Marshall for Oncology Unscripted. Big paper coming out of _JAMA_—it's actually a review article. Really, really smart people and friends up in Boston looked at this. We all see it: this emerging trend of younger and younger people getting all kinds of cancer. This particular paper wasn’t about all kinds of cancer, but we’re clearly seeing it in GI cancers. We don’t really understand what’s going on, but we see it—it’s impacting our clinic. Maybe it was first recognized in the colon cancer clinic, but we’re seeing it in other clinics as well.We have two kinds of schools of thought on why this is happening. On one side, we’ve got this sort of traditional “here’s who gets cancer” list. So, you have a gene, you’ve inherited it, or you have some behavior that increases your risk, or you’re overweight or something, right? You have some known risk factor that we all learned in medical school that’s causing this cancer.Now, if that were true, then our normal 60/40 split of cancers—40% on the right side, 60% on the left side—would hold true in colon cancer. But in fact, most of these young people with colon cancer—up to like 90-something percent—all have rectosigmoid cancers. So, what the heck’s going on? And most of the patients that we see, at least that I see here in Washington, DC, don’t have any of those things on the list that we all memorized.They’re all very fit. They have no real reason to have this—no strong family history and certainly no gene. So, we are looking for novel explanations. The leading one right now has mostly to do with microbiome and understanding what that’s all about. We’re not going to drill down on that today, but we are looking for the explanation as to why.Now, the other piece that goes with this is: if you’re a young person, is your cancer better? Well, it actually doesn’t look that way. If anything, it looks like it might be worse. We know that we fail to diagnose it earlier because it’s not on our radar. If I’m in an urgent care clinic or in an ER or something—or even if I’m a patient with the symptoms—you don’t think to yourself, “Oh, I could have colon cancer,” because you’re 40 years old, and it’s too young to have colon cancer.So, it isn’t a better cancer. But on the flip side, because you’re younger as a patient, doctors tend to be more aggressive. They tend to push treatments harder because young people can take it well. On the flip side of that, they also have much longer to live if we give them some sort of permanent toxicity—say, neuropathy from oxaliplatin.So, it is clearly its own thing. It has its own impact on day-to-day living for these people, because they have to keep working, because they need health insurance here in the United States. They have to tell people about it. So, the impact on their lives is much bigger than, say, if you’re a retired 73-year-old with a good support system.So, that impact is a bit worse. The disease probably is worse. The failure to diagnose is worse. We don’t really know what the biology and the cause is, and more isn’t necessarily better. So, there’s a lot to talk about and think about. Take a look at this paper, see the emerging trends, and share it with your colleagues in other areas of healthcare so that they’re aware of it, too.John Marshall for Oncology Unscripted.[03:51]MedBuzz: Fellows, Funding, and Fewer Radiologists[00:05]John Marshall: John Marshall for Oncology Unscripted, with a little bit of buzz, a little bit of gossip, a little bit of stuff that's trending.You know, this is the end of July when we're filming this, and the squeaky-clean new fellows are here. Don't you love July? New residents and new fellows—you get to teach 'em how 5-FU works and where the bathroom is, and all of those things. But it is—I love this time of year with the new fellows because they're very eager and very interested in learning everything they can. They're not too tired. Everything is good and positive as they learn and go forward. And so, it's just been a great month for us here at Georgetown, and I hope if you work with new trainees—residents, fellows—that you too are having a positive time with them.I've also—the month of July—been struck by a certain late-night TV host who was fired, let go, because his message was to counter the sort of government message that is going on right now. So, I've been really anxious about having any sort of counter message that's out there, because you know what? You might get canceled if you are caught too often with this sort of counter message.How that's affecting us here at an NCI-designated cancer center—or wherever you are—is that I'm not sure what the NCI is gonna look like too long from now. We know there are gonna be cuts. We know the payline—there have been predictions that it'll drop as low as 4% for grants...
    Mehr anzeigen Weniger anzeigen
    38 Min.
Noch keine Rezensionen vorhanden