No Residence, No Permit The Court Decision That Changes Everything Titelbild

No Residence, No Permit The Court Decision That Changes Everything

No Residence, No Permit The Court Decision That Changes Everything

Jetzt kostenlos hören, ohne Abo

Details anzeigen

Über diesen Titel

 No Residence, No Permit? The Court Decision That Changes Everything Welcome to a new episode of the Immigration Law Podcast, I am Avvocato Fabio Loscerbo. Today we discuss a court decision that should make everyone reflect: lawyers, practitioners, and above all foreign nationals living in situations of housing instability. I am referring to the judgment of the Regional Administrative Tribunal for Lazio, Section One Ter, number 3262 of 2026, case number 16545 of 2022, published on 20 February 2026. The case is straightforward. A foreign national applied for the renewal of a residence permit for subordinate employment. The Police Headquarters rejected the application on the grounds that the applicant lacked a real and verifiable residence and was effectively untraceable. The Administrative Court upheld the rejection. The key issue is this: certainty of housing is considered an essential prerequisite for the issuance or renewal of a residence permit. Having a job is not enough. Submitting an application is not enough. What is required is a stable, verifiable, real place of residence. The Court recalled a consistent line of case law according to which a residence permit cannot be granted in situations of serious housing instability or substantial untraceability. It went even further: providing a false address is not a mere formal irregularity. It is an automatically disqualifying circumstance. This means that residence is not a minor bureaucratic detail. It is a substantive element. The State must know where a person legally staying in its territory can actually be found. This is not only an administrative matter; it is also linked to public order. There is another important principle involved: tempus regit actum. A declaration of hospitality produced after the rejection cannot retroactively remedy a housing deficiency existing at the time the decision was adopted. This ruling sends a very clear message: housing stability is an integral part of the integration process. Without effective and concrete rooting in the territory, the residence permit becomes legally fragile. Let us be clear. Integration is not only about employment. It is about real, traceable, stable presence. It is about compliance with the rules, including those concerning registration and residence. For this reason, anyone assisting foreign nationals must carefully verify the housing situation before submitting a renewal application. A mistake on this point can compromise the entire administrative procedure. In immigration law, details are never just details. See you in the next episode.

Questo episodio include contenuti generati dall’IA.
Noch keine Rezensionen vorhanden