Frequently technology implementations go-lives don't go smoothly. Orders get stuck, invoices can't be created, bills can't be paid, customers get angry, and teams spend weekends fixing what should have worked from day one. But some organizations turn on new systems and nothing breaks. This episode reveals exactly why, using a real-world case study of a mid-sized international manufacturer that replaced their core business systems without a single crisis.

What You'll Learn

• Why tech disasters aren't about the software, they're about what happens before go-live
• The leadership decision that eliminates confusion before implementation begins
• How to identify which processes must work on day one (and which can wait)
• The difference between training employees and making them truly ready
• Why "we'll fix it later" is the most expensive phrase in tech implementation
• A practical framework for preventing chaos that any organization can replicate

Who Should Listen

• Business leaders planning technology implementations
• IT directors and project managers overseeing system rollouts
• Operations managers responsible for business continuity during transitions
• Anyone who's experienced (or wants to avoid) a tech implementation disaster

Key Takeaways

Leadership Alignment Matters More Than Technology Success starts when senior leadership makes participation non-negotiable and communicates why the initiative matters to every level of the organization.

Test Real Work, Not Demos Critical workflows must be validated end-to-end under real conditions. If something doesn't work in testing, it won't magically work at go-live.

Answer the Critical Question What must work on day one for the business to operate? Prioritize those processes, validate them, and build contingency plans around them.

Readiness Over Training The real question isn't "Were people trained?" It's "Can people actually do their jobs in the new system under pressure?"

Plan for Problems Before They Exist Inventory staging, customer notifications, strategic timing, and contingency planning are all forms of intentional risk reduction.

Systems Fail Where Organizations Allow Gaps It's not bad luck when implementations fail. Systems break exactly where processes aren't documented, people aren't engaged, and assumptions replace validation.

Featured Case Study

A mid-sized international manufacturer and distributor replacing core systems for financials, procurement, manufacturing, distribution, and customer service. The initiative wasn't just a technology upgrade, it was a business-critical risk. Their approach eliminated go-live chaos through disciplined preparation, not larger budgets or complex tools.

Questions to Ask About Your Organization

Before your next technology initiative, consider:

• Has leadership truly made participation mandatory, or is it still optional in practice?
• Which processes are assumed to work but have never been fully documented or tested?
• Where are you relying on "we'll fix it later" instead of validating now?
• Can your people actually perform their real jobs in the new system, or have they only seen demos?
• Where might people not be fully engaged, and what's the plan to address it?

Bottom Line

Technology implementations don't fail randomly. They fail exactly where organizations allow gaps to exist. The good news? Success is completely repeatable. It doesn't require massive budgets or complex tools. It just requires saying: "Before we turn this on, let's make sure it actually works for everybody who depends on it."

Connect With Me On LinkedIn

www.linkedin.com/in/jimkineon