How .BANK addresses the Cybersecurity Problem | Guest: Drew Schiff
Artikel konnten nicht hinzugefügt werden
Der Titel konnte nicht zum Warenkorb hinzugefügt werden.
Der Titel konnte nicht zum Merkzettel hinzugefügt werden.
„Von Wunschzettel entfernen“ fehlgeschlagen.
„Podcast folgen“ fehlgeschlagen
„Podcast nicht mehr folgen“ fehlgeschlagen
-
Gesprochen von:
-
Von:
Über diesen Titel
Drew Schiff, Director, Engagement Services at fTLD, speaks with Pinky Brand, Senior Vice President at iQ.
00:17 - Introduction and background on open vs. restricted domain extensions and overall cybersecurity threats
02:35 - The origins of the .BANK domain extension
03:46 - The application and approval process of getting .BANK into the root zone
05:00 - What is the primary benefit of the .BANK domain extension to banks and consumers?
09:22 - Who within a bank should be involved in the adoption of ..BANK?
11:11 - What are the requirements to obtain a .BANK domain name?
14:00 - Is it expensive and complex to move a bank's primary URL to .bank? How does it compare to other security, verification, and digital initiatives that banks need to undertake?
17:10 - Comments on vetting each applicant
18:47 - How are users responding to banks using a .bank domain?
22:00 - How .BANK educates registrars, banks, and consumers about .BANK
25:02 - What about premium names? Can a bank reserve or obtain more than one name or register a slogan, etc? (e.g. SuperSafe.bank)
26:42 - What other actions does the .BANK registry take to protect end-users from potential abuse threats?
28:50 - How to learn more and contact .BANK directly for a discussion
Stay informed on your Domain Abuse situation, and get FREE tailor-made reports within seconds from one of the world's most extensive repositories of malicious domains, and gain insight into Domain Abuse trends at: https://abusestats.com/
Recorded: 10 November 2021
