• Ep 16: Adequate Cause: Court Abuse, Pro Se Panic, & Co-Parenting Wars
    Feb 7 2026

    TL;DR: Few phrases create instant panic in family court like adequate cause. It sounds procedural. Neutral. Almost harmless. But in high-conflict custody cases, an adequate cause hearing can become full-scale psychological warfare—driven by vague allegations, stacked motions, and pressure aimed squarely at pro se parents. We explore the heavy emotional toll of responding to motions made of thin air, and how your nervous system responds (spoiler alert: not good). If you’re staring down filings that don’t match reality and feeling your nervous system light up, this episode is for you.

    *****This episode does not provide legal advice. The discussion reflects general legal concepts and personal experience, not guidance for any specific situation.*****

    Long Description: Adequate cause hearings are meant to act as a gatekeeper in family court—filtering out weak or frivolous requests to change a parenting plan. But in high-conflict custody cases, that safeguard often becomes a weapon. When paired with vague allegations, stacked motions, and pressure aimed at pro se parents, adequate cause can quickly turn into full-scale psychological warfare.

    In this episode of High Conflict Hell, Jen and JeniLynn break down what an adequate cause hearing actually is—and why it carries so much weight. We explain how adequate cause functions as a gatekeeping mechanism in custody cases, why “minor modifications” aren’t minor at all, and how the process is often used to reopen conflict rather than resolve it.

    We talk honestly about how court abuse shows up in adequate cause filings: broad claims without evidence, emotional language dressed up as legal fact, and requests for guardian ad litems or temporary plans that shift power long before anything is proven. We also unpack the unique pressure placed on pro se parents—especially mothers—who are expected to respond perfectly to legally complex filings while managing fear, time constraints, and limited resources.

    This episode isn’t legal advice. It’s a reality check. We name the emotional toll of responding to motions made of thin air, the way your nervous system stays in fight-or-flight, and how “stability” is often invoked to justify escalation rather than accountability. We also discuss why adequate cause hearings are intentionally conservative—and how that reality is frequently distorted by aggressive lawyering.

    If you’re staring down an adequate cause hearing and wondering how “nothing” turned into court dates, declarations, and threats—this conversation is for you.

    In this episode, we discuss:

    • What an adequate cause hearing actually is and why it exists
    • The difference between minor and major parenting plan modifications
    • Why “minor” changes can have major, lasting consequences
    • How court abuse appears through vague allegations and unsupported claims
    • Motion stacking and its impact on power dynamics in custody cases
    • The unique stress and disadvantage faced by pro se parents
    • How fear, confusion, and urgency are us

    https://www.highconflicthell.com/?utm_source=ig&utm_medium=social&utm_content=link_in_bio&fbclid=PAZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAc3J0YwZhcHBfaWQMMjU2MjgxMDQwNTU4AAGn5xLFQKCaDCsVmeSwyQtuMydN-_xRj95O7286KH9LquDyIjAbTmDGt9baG9s_aem_0haCDjtc8nivJDk4bCOUpQ

    https://www.youtube.com/@highconflicthell

    https://www.instagram.com/highconflicthell/

    https://www.tiktok.com/@highconflicthell

    Mehr anzeigen Weniger anzeigen
    54 Min.
  • Ep 15: Address Unknown: Where the F Are My Kids? (Wait… Am I a Stalker?)
    Feb 3 2026


    TL;DR:
    You shouldn’t have to be called a “stalker” to find out where your kids are sleeping. But if you have a high-conflict co-parent, it happens—often. And you definitely shouldn’t be threatened for trying to follow a plan that requires an address when that address is being withheld on purpose. When someone uses your children’s safety as bait in a toxic relationship dynamic, what do you do? We don’t pretend to have the perfect answer—but we talk about it.

    Long Description: Few things spike your nervous system faster than realizing you don’t actually know where your kids are sleeping on the other parent’s time—and then getting called a “stalker” for asking.

    In this episode, Jen and JeniLynn go straight into one of the most maddening forms of relationship conflict after separation: using basic child-safety information as a power play. We’re talking addresses. Roommates. Who lives in the home. Where exchanges are supposed to happen. And the twisted logic of being threatened for “not following the parenting plan” while being denied the one thing you need to follow it—the actual residential address.

    If you’ve ever asked—calmly, repeatedly, in writing—“Can you please provide the updated address?” and been stonewalled, mocked, or accused of harassment… you’re in the right place. If your kids are telling you their stuff is “all in Dad’s car,” there’s “a man downstairs,” or they’ve been displaced from their own room because an adult moved in… you’re in the right place. And if your ex (or their lawyer) is turning normal co-parenting transparency into “stalking,” “safety concerns,” and legal threats, you’re definitely in the right place.

    This episode breaks down the real-world chaos of high conflict relationships and toxic relationship patterns that show up in co-parenting—where simple questions become legal theater, and “confidential” becomes a convenient excuse to withhold information that directly impacts children. We talk about the emotional whiplash: trying to stay compliant, trying to stay calm, trying not to react—while being baited into a response that can later be used against you.

    You’ll hear:

    • The “full-blown person in the basement” story (and why nobody seemed to care)
    • How “meet and confer” gets weaponized in email wars
    • The bizarre double-bind: “Pick up at my address” + “I won’t give you my address”
    • How allegations like “stalking” and “harassment” get tossed around to shut down reasonable parenting communication
    • Why this is a classic relationship conflicts pattern in toxic relationships: control through confusion, threats, and intimidation—especially when one parent is pro se

    This isn’t legal advice. It’s a reality check—and a survival conversation for anyone living inside a high-conflict, toxic co-parenting relationship where your kids’ whereabouts become the battleground.



    https://www.highconflicthell.com/?utm_source=ig&utm_medium=social&utm_content=link_in_bio&fbclid=PAZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAc3J0YwZhcHBfaWQMMjU2MjgxMDQwNTU4AAGn5xLFQKCaDCsVmeSwyQtuMydN-_xRj95O7286KH9LquDyIjAbTmDGt9baG9s_aem_0haCDjtc8nivJDk4bCOUpQ

    https://www.youtube.com/@highconflicthell

    https://www.instagram.com/highconflicthell/

    https://www.tiktok.com/@highconflicthell

    Mehr anzeigen Weniger anzeigen
    51 Min.
  • Ep 14: Contempt in Custody Cases: Fear Tactics, Lies, and What It Really Means
    Jan 31 2026

    TL;DR: Contempt is one of the most intimidating words in family court—but it’s also one of the most misunderstood. In this episode, we break down what contempt really means in custody cases, what it doesn’t mean, and how threats of sanctions, fines, or jail are often used to create fear in high-conflict co-parenting. If you’ve ever opened an email and felt your nervous system leave your body, this episode is for you.

    *****This episode does not provide legal advice. The discussion reflects general legal concepts and personal experience, not guidance for any specific situation.*****

    Long Description: Few words trigger panic in family court like contempt. It shows up in lawyer emails, court filings, and threats that make your heart race before you even finish reading the subject line. But in custody cases, contempt is often misunderstood—and in high-conflict co-parenting, it’s frequently used as a pressure tactic rather than a reflection of actual wrongdoing.

    In this episode of High Conflict Hell, Jen and JeniLynn explain what contempt really means in custody cases—and what it doesn’t. We walk through how contempt works in family court, why it requires more than frustration or disagreement, and how fear-based threats can distort parents’ understanding of their actual legal risk.

    We talk openly about the emotional reality of receiving contempt threats: the anxiety, the sleepless nights, the urge to over-explain, and the way every parenting decision suddenly feels like evidence. This episode isn’t legal advice—it’s a reality check for parents navigating high-conflict custody, aggressive lawyering, and constant pressure to stay calm while being provoked.

    If you’ve been told you’re “in contempt” for being confused, cautious, or protective—or if you’ve been threatened with sanctions for not responding fast enough or “the right way”—this conversation is meant to ground you. Not to minimize the seriousness of court orders, but to separate real contempt from fear-mongering.

    In this episode, we discuss:

    • What contempt means in custody cases and how it actually works in family court
    • What contempt does NOT mean (and what doesn’t qualify)
    • Why contempt requires more than disagreement, confusion, or good-faith mistakes
    • How threats of sanctions, fines, or jail are used in high-conflict co-parenting
    • The difference between enforcement and intimidation in custody disputes
    • Why fear-based lawyering escalates conflict instead of resolving it
    • How contempt threats impact parents emotionally and psychologically
    • What to focus on when your inbox fills with legal threats and pressure

    This episode is for parents who are doing their best inside a system that often rewards escalation over resolution. You’re not weak for being scared. You’re not wrong for wanting clarity. And you’re not alone in feeling overwhelmed by the word contempt.

    Welcome to High Conflict Hell—where we name the fear, explain the reality, and tell the truth out loud.

    https://www.highconflicthell.com/?utm_source=ig&utm_medium=social&utm_content=link_in_bio&fbclid=PAZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAc3J0YwZhcHBfaWQMMjU2MjgxMDQwNTU4AAGn5xLFQKCaDCsVmeSwyQtuMydN-_xRj95O7286KH9LquDyIjAbTmDGt9baG9s_aem_0haCDjtc8nivJDk4bCOUpQ

    https://www.youtube.com/@highconflicthell

    https://www.instagram.com/highconflicthell/

    https://www.tiktok.com/@highconflicthell

    Mehr anzeigen Weniger anzeigen
    50 Min.
  • Ep 13: Performative Parenting: If Nobody’s Watching, Does it Count? (The Co-Parenting Olympics)
    Jan 27 2026

    TL;DR: When co-parenting turns into a performance, it’s not about the kids—it’s about who’s watching. We unpack performative parenting, the Co-Parenting Olympics, and why some parents suddenly become “Parent of the Year” when court, lawyers, or outsiders are involved.

    From gymnastics that disappear after trial to emails written for an audience, this episode names what’s really happening in high conflict relationships and relationship conflict—and why living under constant scrutiny changes how you parent, respond, and survive. Along the way, we’re honest about what parenting looks like off-stage, what actually matters to us, and where performance ends.

    Long Description: Few things are as disorienting in a high conflict relationship as realizing that parenting has turned into a performance. Suddenly, decisions aren’t about what actually works for the kids—they’re about optics. Who’s watching. How it looks in writing. How it sounds in court. How it might be repeated by a lawyer, a guardian ad litem, or someone else with power over your family.

    In this episode of High Conflict Hell, Jen and JeniLynn talk about performative parenting—what it is, how it shows up in high-conflict co-parenting, and why it becomes so common once lawyers, courts, or outside audiences enter the picture. We unpack how parenting behaviors can escalate around hearings and trials, only to disappear once the spotlight moves on—and how confusing and destabilizing that can feel inside an already intense relationship conflict.

    We talk about the Co-Parenting Olympics: sudden extracurriculars, carefully documented dentist visits, perfectly worded emails, and parenting choices that seem designed less for the children and more for an audience. We explore why performance is often rewarded in systems built on limited snapshots—and why consistent, invisible labor rarely makes it into court narratives, especially in high-conflict family systems.

    This episode also digs into the emotional toll of living under constant scrutiny. When every message feels like evidence. When you start filtering your words through how they’ll sound “read out loud.” When it feels like you have to perform too—or risk being labeled negligent, uncooperative, or unstable. In ongoing relationship conflicts, that pressure can quietly reshape how you parent, communicate, and even see yourself.

    This isn’t about demonizing effort or pretending parenting doesn’t involve showing up. It’s about naming when performance becomes a weapon—used in high conflict relationships to control narratives rather than support children. And it’s about validating how exhausting it is to raise kids inside systems that often prioritize appearances over reality.

    In this episode, we discuss:

    • What performative parenting looks like in a high conflict relationship
    • How parenting behavior shifts during litigation, hearings, and evaluations
    • Why some parenting efforts peak during court involvement and vanish afterward
    • How performance is rewarded in custody systems while consistency i

    https://www.highconflicthell.com/?utm_source=ig&utm_medium=social&utm_content=link_in_bio&fbclid=PAZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAc3J0YwZhcHBfaWQMMjU2MjgxMDQwNTU4AAGn5xLFQKCaDCsVmeSwyQtuMydN-_xRj95O7286KH9LquDyIjAbTmDGt9baG9s_aem_0haCDjtc8nivJDk4bCOUpQ

    https://www.youtube.com/@highconflicthell

    https://www.instagram.com/highconflicthell/

    https://www.tiktok.com/@highconflicthell

    Mehr anzeigen Weniger anzeigen
    58 Min.
  • Ep 12: Guardian ad Litem: Hell by Appointment
    Jan 24 2026

    TL;DR: What is a Guardian ad Litem, and what happens in high-conflict custody cases? This episode explains the Guardian ad Litem process, what parents can expect, and why GAL recommendations can feel unpredictable or overwhelming when conflict, fear, and court pressure collide.

    Long Description: What is a Guardian ad Litem, and what actually happens once one enters a high-conflict custody case? For many parents, the appointment of a GAL feels like the moment everything shifts—suddenly, a stranger has enormous influence over your parenting time, your credibility, and your children’s future.

    In this episode of High Conflict Hell, Jen and Jenny Lynn break down the Guardian ad Litem process from lived experience, not theory. We talk about what a GAL is supposed to do versus how the process often plays out in real life, especially in high-conflict co-parenting cases where fear, power imbalances, and legal pressure are already high.

    Parents are often told a Guardian ad Litem is there to “represent the best interests of the child.” But what does that actually mean when information is limited, timelines are rushed, conflict is ongoing, and every interaction feels like it could be misinterpreted? This episode explores why GAL recommendations can feel unpredictable, overwhelming, or even devastating—and why so many parents walk away from the process feeling unheard or exposed rather than protected.

    We also talk about the emotional toll of GAL investigations: being evaluated while parenting under stress, managing lawyer involvement, trying to stay regulated while knowing every word and decision may be filtered through someone else’s lens. This isn’t about attacking Guardian ad Litems—it’s about acknowledging how much power the role holds and how destabilizing the process can feel for families already living in survival mode.

    This episode is for parents navigating high-conflict custody, considering what a Guardian ad Litem appointment really means, or trying to make sense of a recommendation that doesn’t feel aligned with their lived reality.

    In this episode, we discuss:

    • What a Guardian ad Litem is and their role in custody cases
    • How GAL investigations typically work in high-conflict situations
    • Why parents often feel confused, judged, or blindsided by GAL recommendations
    • The emotional and psychological impact of being evaluated while parenting under pressure
    • How conflict, fear, and court dynamics can shape the information a GAL sees
    • Why “best interests of the child” can feel subjective in practice
    • The power imbalance parents experience once a GAL enters the case
    • Why the GAL process can feel unpredictable—even when you’re doing everything “right”
    • How to emotionally survive the process when the outcome feels out of your control

    This episode does not offer legal advice. It offers something many parents don’t get enough of during custody litigation: context, honesty, and validation.

    If you’re searching for answers about Guardian ad Litems in

    https://www.highconflicthell.com/?utm_source=ig&utm_medium=social&utm_content=link_in_bio&fbclid=PAZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAc3J0YwZhcHBfaWQMMjU2MjgxMDQwNTU4AAGn5xLFQKCaDCsVmeSwyQtuMydN-_xRj95O7286KH9LquDyIjAbTmDGt9baG9s_aem_0haCDjtc8nivJDk4bCOUpQ

    https://www.youtube.com/@highconflicthell

    https://www.instagram.com/highconflicthell/

    https://www.tiktok.com/@highconflicthell

    Mehr anzeigen Weniger anzeigen
    53 Min.
  • Ep 11: Parental Alienation vs. Estrangement: How Courts Are Being Used as a Battlefield
    Jan 20 2026

    TL;DR Parental alienation and estrangement are not the same thing — but in family court, they get used like they are. Lawyers are uses alienation as a weapon, and the costs are children. Is this a real issue? Can be. Is it being overused by attorneys as a weapon? Absolutely.

    We talk about this from both sides — as parents living inside high-conflict custody and as a lawyer watching how courts turn family breakdown into legal warfare. We break down how estrangement gets mislabeled as alienation, why so many moms end up accused of “campaigns,” and how fear takes over once threats of contempt, fines, or losing your kids enter the room.

    *****This episode does not provide legal advice. The discussion reflects general legal concepts and personal experience, not guidance for any specific situation.*****

    Long Description: What happens when parental alienation is used as a weapon instead of a diagnosis?

    In this episode of High Conflict Hell, Jen and JeniLynn break down one of the most dangerous and misunderstood issues in family court: how estrangement gets mislabeled as parental alienation — and how that mislabeling fuels high-conflict custody battles.

    We walk through a real, unfolding custody conflict where a child refuses visitation — and how that refusal becomes framed as alienation instead of examined as estrangement. We show how quickly the focus shifts away from why a child is pulling back and onto who to blame.

    We examine how ordinary parenting behaviors — communicating concerns, responding to a child in distress, trying to prevent emotional harm — can suddenly become legal evidence once lawyers get involved. And how fast fear takes over when parents are threatened with contempt motions, sanctions, fines, or losing time with their children.

    In this episode, we break down real-life examples of estrangement being twisted into parental alienation accusations, including:

    • A series of incidents that led to a child’s distance from a parent, including infidelity, discovery through synced devices, and lying
    • A child’s refusal to attend visits being blamed on Mom
    • A last-minute school-night hockey invitation escalating into a full custody crisis
    • Normal co-parenting communication being reframed as a “campaign”
    • Courts enforcing parenting time instead of addressing the behavior that caused the estrangement

    We also unpack the legal reality behind parental alienation accusations — why the term rarely appears in actual statutes, yet shows up constantly in court filings, contempt motions, and custody disputes. How it becomes a shortcut for discrediting a parent when children speak up about discomfort, broken trust, or emotional harm.

    And we confront the question family court too often asks first:

    Not “Is the child safe?”
    But “What if she’s lying?”

    We talk about how that framing turns protective parenting into “high-conflict behavior,” how reactions become evidence, and how fear sile

    https://www.highconflicthell.com/?utm_source=ig&utm_medium=social&utm_content=link_in_bio&fbclid=PAZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAc3J0YwZhcHBfaWQMMjU2MjgxMDQwNTU4AAGn5xLFQKCaDCsVmeSwyQtuMydN-_xRj95O7286KH9LquDyIjAbTmDGt9baG9s_aem_0haCDjtc8nivJDk4bCOUpQ

    https://www.youtube.com/@highconflicthell

    https://www.instagram.com/highconflicthell/

    https://www.tiktok.com/@highconflicthell

    Mehr anzeigen Weniger anzeigen
    50 Min.
  • Ep 10: Lawyers: How High-Conflict Co-Parenting Becomes a $20,000 Hell
    Jan 17 2026

    TL;DR Lawyers, $400/hour billing, $20,000 retainers, the nicknames that get us through, and the real cost of litigating love. This isn’t legal advice — it’s a real conversation about what happens when family court lawyers turn high-conflict co-parenting into a billing strategy and kids become collateral.

    We talk about this from both sides of the system — as parents trapped inside high-conflict custody battles and as a lawyer watching the system break from the inside. We break down how family lawyers escalate cases instead of resolving them, why so many parents end up thinking “my lawyer made things worse,” and how fear takes over once threats of contempt, fines, or jail enter the room.

    We also unpack threat emails, “mediation offers” with strings attached, and how legal pressure keeps families stuck in fight-or-flight while the bills keep climbing.

    *****This episode does not provide legal advice. The discussion reflects general legal concepts and personal experience, not guidance for any specific situation.*****


    Long Description:
    Do lawyers make co-parenting worse?
    In this episode of High Conflict Hell, Jen and JeniLynn answer that question from both sides of the system — as parents trapped inside high-conflict family court, and from the perspective of someone who is actually a lawyer watching the system from the inside.

    Because here’s the truth most people don’t realize until they’re already drowning in it: Money is the game. Fear is the fuel. And your children are the leverage.

    We talk about what happens when a simple co-parenting disagreement turns into a $20,000 retainer, 96 emails in three months, and nonstop threats of contempt, fines, and even jail — all before anything about the kids has actually been resolved.

    This episode pulls back the curtain on how family court lawyers turn conflict into profit and reactions into evidence. We walk through real examples from an active custody case — from kids not having beds, to school trips being framed as kidnapping, to therapy being used as a legal weapon — and show how normal parenting becomes criminalized the moment lawyers step in.

    We talk about:

    • How aggressive demand letters are designed to trigger fear and reactions
    • Why “mediation offers” come with strings attached
    • How six-minute billing rewards escalation instead of resolution
    • Why so many parents end up saying “my lawyer made things worse”
    • And how your ex’s lawyer escalates while claiming to be “just following the plan”

    We also dig into how fear drives the entire system. When lawyers start talking about alienation, contempt, fines, and losing time with your kids, parents stop thinking clearly. They defend themselves. They react. And every reaction becomes another billable moment.

    From the inside, this isn’t accidental — it’s how the system makes money.

    This episode also explores what it feels like to be attacked on two fronts at once: publicly as a “high-confl

    https://www.highconflicthell.com/?utm_source=ig&utm_medium=social&utm_content=link_in_bio&fbclid=PAZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAc3J0YwZhcHBfaWQMMjU2MjgxMDQwNTU4AAGn5xLFQKCaDCsVmeSwyQtuMydN-_xRj95O7286KH9LquDyIjAbTmDGt9baG9s_aem_0haCDjtc8nivJDk4bCOUpQ

    https://www.youtube.com/@highconflicthell

    https://www.instagram.com/highconflicthell/

    https://www.tiktok.com/@highconflicthell

    Mehr anzeigen Weniger anzeigen
    59 Min.
  • Ep 9: She’s Crazy: The High-Conflict Baby Mama Label and the Cost of Defending Yourself
    Jan 13 2026

    TL;DR: “She’s crazy” is the oldest trick in the book — and family court loves it. In this episode, we embrace the label and talk about how we got branded “crazy, stupid, witches” after years of gaslighting, reactive abuse, and toxic relationship dynamics.

    We break down the high-conflict baby mama label — why it’s trending, how 50/50 custody schedules create a literal petri dish for conflict, and how a new partner, a lawyer, or a messy exchange schedule can turn normal parenting issues into “proof” you’re unstable.

    If you’re tired of defending yourself, being told to “just ignore it,” or living in a world where your reaction is the only thing anyone sees — you’re in the right place.

    Long Description:

    “She’s crazy.”
    “She’s unhinged.”
    “She’s high-conflict.”

    Those three words destroy more mothers in family court than almost anything else — because once you’re labeled, everything you do gets filtered through it.

    In this episode of High Conflict Hell, Jen and JeniLynn take on the high-conflict baby mama label and ask the question no one in the legal system wants to touch: Are there really that many “crazy moms”… or has modern co-parenting and custody law created a system that makes women look unstable when they’re reacting to chaos?

    We talk about how 50/50 custody schedules, constant exchanges, homework forgotten at the other house, last-minute cancellations, and parking-lot confrontations create a petri dish for conflict — especially when you’re forced to co-parent with someone who doesn’t like you, doesn’t respect you, or actively wants to provoke you.

    We also get into the role of:

    • New partners who whisper, “Wow… she’s crazy”
    • Lawyers who profit from reactions
    • Therapy language being weaponized (“My therapist says you traumatized me”)
    • And how gaslighting and reactive abuse turn your emotional response into “evidence” while the original behavior disappears

    We talk about how women — especially emotional, expressive, justice-driven women — get labeled crazy, hysterical, dramatic, and high-conflict for doing the same thing men get praised for: pushing back.

    This episode also goes deep into triangulation: what happens when kids come to their mom for safety, and mom gets blamed for “making things worse.” We talk about what it’s like when children say, “Don’t tell Dad” or “Don’t tell Grandma” because they know it will blow up — and how that puts mothers in impossible positions where every choice becomes “wrong.”

    We share real stories about:

    • Being told “I always thought you were crazy — she’s crazier”
    • Exes who are charming in person but brutal through lawyers
    • Being accused of giving someone PTSD for reacting to betrayal
    • How cheating, abandonment, and emotional whiplash get rewritten as your instability
    • And what it feels like when you finally experience a healthy relationship where someone just says, “Okay,” instead of pushing you into a meltdown

    This isn’t abou

    https://www.highconflicthell.com/?utm_source=ig&utm_medium=social&utm_content=link_in_bio&fbclid=PAZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAc3J0YwZhcHBfaWQMMjU2MjgxMDQwNTU4AAGn5xLFQKCaDCsVmeSwyQtuMydN-_xRj95O7286KH9LquDyIjAbTmDGt9baG9s_aem_0haCDjtc8nivJDk4bCOUpQ

    https://www.youtube.com/@highconflicthell

    https://www.instagram.com/highconflicthell/

    https://www.tiktok.com/@highconflicthell

    Mehr anzeigen Weniger anzeigen
    52 Min.