Fiduciary Risk Is Judgment Risk—Not Control Risk
Artikel konnten nicht hinzugefügt werden
Der Titel konnte nicht zum Warenkorb hinzugefügt werden.
Der Titel konnte nicht zum Merkzettel hinzugefügt werden.
„Von Wunschzettel entfernen“ fehlgeschlagen.
„Podcast folgen“ fehlgeschlagen
„Podcast nicht mehr folgen“ fehlgeschlagen
-
Gesprochen von:
-
Von:
A judgment process follows every rule, passes every approval, and leaves the fiduciary risk completely untouched. The documentation is flawless. The committee voted. The controls all worked. So why does the exposure remain?
In this episode of Invisible Threat, Carter Wilcoxson explores a counterintuitive truth with Dr. Matthew Eby and Joanne Eby: fiduciary risk doesn't originate in failed processes or broken controls. It forms much earlier—in the distortion of judgment itself, before any decision is made. Unlike credit risk or market risk, fiduciary risk lives in interpretation, in how discretionary decisions are made under conditions of uncertainty and competing interests. This conversation redefines what fiduciary organizations actually need to measure, and why the controls that feel most protective may be missing the threat entirely.
Carter Wilcoxson, CEO and founder, brings decades of financial services leadership to this examination, testing each idea and pushing toward clarity. As someone who has spent a career understanding how organizations manage competing obligations and exercise discretion responsibly, Carter recognizes that this reframing—from process risk to judgment risk—changes everything about how fiduciary committees approach their work. Dr. Matthew Eby and Joanne Eby, coauthors of The Invisible Threat, guide this fundamental shift in how we think about fiduciary risk management.
About the Guest: Dr. Matthew Eby and Joanne Eby are coauthors of The Invisible Threat, a comprehensive examination of fiduciary risk in financial institutions. Their work challenges conventional approaches to risk assessment and offers organizations a new framework for understanding judgment-based risk in complex decision-making environments.