Episode 7 – Security Theater: The Difference Between Looking Safe and Being Safe

Not all security measures actually make people safer.

In this episode of Vigilant By Design, host Benjamin Johnson, CPP, PSP, PMP, examines Security Theater — the practice of implementing highly visible security measures that create the appearance of safety without meaningfully reducing risk. We also explore where virtue signaling can enter security decisions, and why optics-driven choices often replace effectiveness.

This episode is not about criticizing intent. Most organizations genuinely want to protect people. But when security decisions are driven by perception, pressure, or talking points instead of risk reduction, the result is often a false sense of safety.

Topics include:

• What Security Theater is — and why it happens

• Common examples of optics-based security measures

• The difference between reassurance and protection

• How virtue signaling can influence security decisions in certain environments

• The operational, legal, and reputational risks of performative security

• Why real security is often quieter, less visible, and more deliberate

• The leadership courage required to say no to ineffective solutions

We reframe the conversation around better questions security leaders should be asking:

• Does this reduce risk?

• Does this change behavior?

• Does this improve response?

• Can we defend this decision after an incident?

Looking safe is not the same as being safe. Effective security is layered, intentional, measurable, and accountable — even when it isn’t flashy.

If you’re responsible for security decisions, budgeting, or risk ownership, this episode will challenge assumptions and help you focus on what truly protects people and places.

#VigilantSecurity #VSC #SaferSpaces #SecurityConsulting #HardenYourSite #CrimeIsComing #VigilantByDesign