Episode 21 – The Disaster Recovery Test That Worked Only on Paper | CISA Domain 4: Business Continuity & DR Governance
Artikel konnten nicht hinzugefügt werden
Der Titel konnte nicht zum Warenkorb hinzugefügt werden.
Der Titel konnte nicht zum Merkzettel hinzugefügt werden.
„Von Wunschzettel entfernen“ fehlgeschlagen.
„Podcast folgen“ fehlgeschlagen
„Podcast nicht mehr folgen“ fehlgeschlagen
-
Gesprochen von:
-
Von:
Über diesen Titel
CISA Domain 4: Business Continuity & DR Governance
This episode is part of the CISA Audit Judgment Series — a structured learning path focused on Domains 4 and 5, the heaviest-weighted areas of the CISA exam.
In this episode, we analyze a Disaster Recovery test that was declared “successful” — even though no real failover occurred, no production data was restored, and no business validation took place. The test passed on paper, but not in reality. This scenario exposes a major gap in operational resilience maturity.
You’ll learn:
✔ Why CISA focuses on DR test evidence, not documentation
✔ Why DR tests fail despite official reports showing success
✔ How junior auditors interpret DR vs. how audit leaders evaluate capability
✔ What evidence auditors must review for DR governance
✔ How to assess RTO/RPO validation, test scope, and business involvement
✔ What CISA is actually testing in continuity and recovery questions
✔ The risks when DR tests pass on paper but fail in practice
This episode teaches CISA exam judgment and real audit leadership — the core of the CyberLex Audit Judgment Series.
If you’re preparing for CISA or sharpening your audit judgment,
explore the CISA Gold Standard Series by M.G. Vance on Amazon.
📘 Amazon link: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0FX526S3V
We don’t just help you pass.
We prepare you to become formidable in the field.
