Ep 21- Implied Rights & Vibes: Federalists vs. Anti-Federalists Titelbild

Ep 21- Implied Rights & Vibes: Federalists vs. Anti-Federalists

Ep 21- Implied Rights & Vibes: Federalists vs. Anti-Federalists

Jetzt kostenlos hören, ohne Abo

Details anzeigen

Nur 0,99 € pro Monat für die ersten 3 Monate

Danach 9.95 € pro Monat. Bedingungen gelten.

Über diesen Titel

 Welcome back from winter break—because nothing says “new year, fresh start” like diving straight into how the United States almost tripped over its own founding documents. This episode was recorded before the break, but the chaos holds up beautifully. We’re picking up right where the Founders left off: arguing loudly, writing anonymously, and pretending that “implied rights” were a solid plan for a brand-new nation.

This week we break down the Federalists, who looked at the Constitution and said, “No worries, all your rights are in there… somewhere.” Figures like Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison argued that listing rights was unnecessary—and possibly dangerous—because surely the government would never abuse powers that were only vaguely defined. History, as always, was taking notes.

Then we turn to the Anti-Federalists, who were not buying the “trust us” model of governance. Writers using pen names—because criticizing the foundation of the country was already risky business—pushed hard for explicit protections. Figures often associated with this camp, like Patrick Henry, argued that guaranteed rights didn’t weaken the Constitution—they strengthened it. Shockingly, demanding written limits on government power turned out to be a good idea. Who could’ve guessed?

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/4th-period-u-s-history--5621461/support.

Visit the class at Spreaker.com and follow! Link to the page HERE! It would mean a lot and go a long way in helping grow class! Thank you for your support!
Noch keine Rezensionen vorhanden