Ep. 13: How GenAI roles shape perceptions of value in human-AI collaboration
Artikel konnten nicht hinzugefügt werden
Der Titel konnte nicht zum Warenkorb hinzugefügt werden.
Der Titel konnte nicht zum Merkzettel hinzugefügt werden.
„Von Wunschzettel entfernen“ fehlgeschlagen.
„Podcast folgen“ fehlgeschlagen
„Podcast nicht mehr folgen“ fehlgeschlagen
Ep. 13: How GenAI roles shape perceptions of value in human-AI collaboration
-
Gesprochen von:
-
Von:
Über diesen Titel
When we talk about AI collaboration, the question is usually whether AI was used or not. This binary misses something crucial about how humans actually experience working with generative systems. The question is not just about whether AI was involved but also when and how it participated in the creative process.
A recent study suggests that when AI generates first drafts versus provides feedback fundamentally changes how people perceive their creative contribution. When AI starts the work, humans feel like editors rather than creators, even when doing substantial revision. But when humans start and AI refines, the final output feels both higher quality and more authentically their own. The twist? People expect others to devalue AI-enhanced work, creating a tension between internal pride and external credibility. This isn't just about tools - it's about how role assignment shapes creative ownership and the social meaning of AI collaboration.
Source: Schecter, A., & Richardson, B. (2025, April). How the Role of Generative AI Shapes Perceptions of Value in Human-AI Collaborative Work. In Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-15). (open access)
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit artificialthought.substack.com
