Arguments, But Online (with Dana Schwartz, Andrew Ti)
Artikel konnten nicht hinzugefügt werden
Der Titel konnte nicht zum Warenkorb hinzugefügt werden.
Der Titel konnte nicht zum Merkzettel hinzugefügt werden.
„Von Wunschzettel entfernen“ fehlgeschlagen.
„Podcast folgen“ fehlgeschlagen
„Podcast nicht mehr folgen“ fehlgeschlagen
-
Gesprochen von:
-
Von:
Über diesen Titel
Treat others how you want to be treated, unless you’re on the internet. For our second episode, we talk about a topic that's difficult to avoid nowadays: online arguments. We're joined by author Dana Schwartz to discuss how a tweet about South Park went out of hand. Then, TV writer and podcast host Andrew Ti reveals his thoughts on who an internet argument is really for. Lastly, we take a deep dive and try to answer the question--is it possible to change someone's opinion online?
Act One (1:18) || Act Two (25:32) || Act 3 (52:12)
Our art was done by Jaya Nicely (www.jayanicely.com) and our intro music was mixed by Wade Ryan (Gold Sedan on Spotify). Sources used for this episode include:
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/02/27/why-facts-dont-change-our-minds
https://www.smh.com.au/technology/how-to-win-an-online-argument-lessons-from-reddit-20160216-gmuwgw.html
https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2017/03/this-article-wont-change-your-mind/519093
https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1410/1410.0610.pdf
https://www.washington.edu/news/2021/04/19/uw-researchers-studying-how-to-make-online-arguments-productive/
https://www.theatlantic.com/membership/archive/2017/12/how-do-we-have-a-better-conversation/548927/
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
