AI for Materials: Breakthrough or Illusion?
Artikel konnten nicht hinzugefügt werden
Der Titel konnte nicht zum Warenkorb hinzugefügt werden.
Der Titel konnte nicht zum Merkzettel hinzugefügt werden.
„Von Wunschzettel entfernen“ fehlgeschlagen.
„Podcast folgen“ fehlgeschlagen
„Podcast nicht mehr folgen“ fehlgeschlagen
-
Gesprochen von:
-
Von:
Über diesen Titel
Sign up to New Wave's newsletter.
***
This week on New Wave Weekly:
👉 AI won’t magically invent new materials
AlphaFold worked because biology had great data. Inorganic materials don’t. Sparse datasets, missing thermodynamics, and poor characterization remain the biggest blockers.
👉 The real moat is synthesis, not models
From rare-earth-free magnets to catalysts, value is created in the lab: making, characterizing, and scaling materials that actually work in the real world.
👉 Vertical beats generalist (for now)
Foundational models are capital-intensive moonshots. Highly verticalized plays, magnets, catalysts, specific industrial use cases, have a much clearer path to market.
👉 Commercialization is brutally hard
Discovery is step one. Producing at scale, at cost, and getting industry adoption is where most materials stories break, graphene being the cautionary tale.
👉 Europe’s materials moment?
With critical minerals concentrated in China, supply-chain security is creating real pull from industrial players, not just curiosity, but urgency.
***
Wave Makers:
Matt - Voyager Ventures
Robina - Contrarian
Vera - Apex Ventures
Hugo - New Wave
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit newwavenewsletter.substack.com
