27 | Could a Contract Have Stopped the Lawsuit?
Artikel konnten nicht hinzugefügt werden
Der Titel konnte nicht zum Warenkorb hinzugefügt werden.
Der Titel konnte nicht zum Merkzettel hinzugefügt werden.
„Von Wunschzettel entfernen“ fehlgeschlagen.
„Podcast folgen“ fehlgeschlagen
„Podcast nicht mehr folgen“ fehlgeschlagen
-
Gesprochen von:
-
Von:
Über diesen Titel
A missing document. A $50K lawsuit. All because one service agreement was never signed.
What Happened
A health and wellness entrepreneur worked with a client—without ever signing a contract. When the relationship soured, they got hit with a lawsuit for over $50,000… and had no signed agreement to back them up.
Why It Matters
In the eyes of the law, the contract is king. Without a written agreement, expectations become fuzzy, IP ownership is unclear, and legal protections vanish.
The Expensive Lesson
Instead of showing a signed agreement and ending the issue instantly, the entrepreneur now has to defend themselves in court—costing time, money, and peace of mind.
What Would’ve Prevented It
A simple, customized, industry-specific service agreement. Signed at the start. That’s it.
Key Takeaways
✔️ No contract = no clarity if things go wrong
✔️ Lawsuits are 10x more expensive than proactive legal setup
✔️ Without a signed agreement, legal outcomes become 50/50 gambles
✔️ Legal protection starts with ONE document, not court
🎧 Listen to the episode now to learn what could’ve prevented this—and how to protect yourself before it's too late.
📞 Book a legal call
📸 Instagram
👥 Join Our Facebook Group
