Peak
Secrets from the New Science of Expertise
Artikel konnten nicht hinzugefügt werden
Der Titel konnte nicht zum Warenkorb hinzugefügt werden.
Der Titel konnte nicht zum Merkzettel hinzugefügt werden.
„Von Wunschzettel entfernen“ fehlgeschlagen.
„Podcast folgen“ fehlgeschlagen
„Podcast nicht mehr folgen“ fehlgeschlagen
Peak
Für 25,95 € kaufen
-
Gesprochen von:
-
Geoffrey Beevers
Über diesen Titel
Mozart wasn't born with perfect pitch. Most athletes are not born with any natural advantage. Three world-class chess players were sisters whose success was planned by their parents before they were even born.
Anders Ericsson has spent 30 years studying the special ones - the geniuses, sports stars and musical prodigies. And his remarkable finding, revealed in Peak, is that their special abilities are acquired through training. The innate 'gift' of talent is a myth. Exceptional individuals are born with just one unique ability, shared by us all - the ability to develop our brains and bodies through our own efforts.
Anders Ericsson's research was the inspiration for the popular '10,000-hour rule', but, he tells us, this rule is only the beginning of the story. It's not just the hours that are important but how you use them. We all have the seeds of excellence within us - it's merely a question of how to make them grow.
With a bit of guidance, you'll be amazed at what the average person can achieve. The astonishing stories in Peak prove that potential is what you make it.
©2016 Anders Ericsson (P)2016 Random House Audiobooks
Diese Titel könnten dich auch interessieren
Evidence based demonstration of the power of practice to achieve anything
Ein Fehler ist aufgetreten. Bitte versuche es in ein paar Minuten noch einmal.
Ein sehr praxisorientiertes Buch!
Ein Fehler ist aufgetreten. Bitte versuche es in ein paar Minuten noch einmal.
author ha problem with logic. I hope he is not scientist and his income doesn't depend on it. when he talks about the jumper from new Zealand, and he wants to prove that it was due to deliver are practice and not due to talent. the whole prove is , look how much he improved, so it must be deliberate practice. really? this is your prove? the jumper didn't improve in his later years, so it is most certainly deliberate practice. even though I agree with the thesis, it just makes me angry how author uses the initial thesis, which he wants to prove, as an argument to prove itself.
one simple thought, and problem with logic
Ein Fehler ist aufgetreten. Bitte versuche es in ein paar Minuten noch einmal.
Miserable Audioqualität
Ein Fehler ist aufgetreten. Bitte versuche es in ein paar Minuten noch einmal.