The Problem of Immigration in a Slaveholding Republic Titelbild

The Problem of Immigration in a Slaveholding Republic

Policing Mobility in the Nineteenth-Century United States

Reinhören
0,00 € - kostenlos hören
Prime Logo Bist du Amazon Prime-Mitglied?
Audible 60 Tage kostenlos testen
Aktiviere das kostenlose Probeabo mit der Option, monatlich flexibel zu pausieren oder zu kündigen.
Nach dem Probemonat bekommst du eine vielfältige Auswahl an Hörbüchern, Kinderhörspielen und Original Podcasts für 9,95 € pro Monat.
Wähle monatlich einen Titel aus dem Gesamtkatalog und behalte ihn.

The Problem of Immigration in a Slaveholding Republic

Von: Kevin Kenny
Gesprochen von: Bill Andrew Quinn
0,00 € - kostenlos hören

9,95 € pro Monat nach 30 Tagen. Monatlich kündbar.

Für 21,95 € kaufen

Für 21,95 € kaufen

Über diesen Titel

Today the United States considers immigration a federal matter. Yet, despite America's reputation as a "nation of immigrants," the Constitution is silent on the admission, exclusion, and expulsion of foreigners. Before the Civil War, the federal government played virtually no role in regulating immigration.

Offering an original interpretation of nineteenth-century America, The Problem of Immigration in a Slaveholding Republic argues that the existence, abolition, and legacies of slavery were central to the emergence of a national immigration policy. In the century after the American Revolution, states controlled mobility within and across their borders. Throughout the antebellum era, defenders of slavery feared that, if Congress gained control over immigration, it could also regulate the movement of free black people and the interstate slave trade. The Civil War and the abolition of slavery removed the political and constitutional obstacles to a national immigration policy. Admission remained the norm for Europeans, but Chinese laborers were excluded through techniques of registration, punishment, and deportation first used against free black people in the antebellum South. To justify these measures, the Supreme Court ruled that immigration authority was inherent in national sovereignty and required no constitutional justification.

©2023 Oxford University Press (P)2024 HighBridge, a division of Recorded Books
Nord-, Mittel- & Südamerika Recht
Noch keine Rezensionen vorhanden