Breaking the Spell Titelbild

Breaking the Spell

Religion as a Natural Phenomenon

 Reinhören

30 Tage Audible Standard kostenlos testen

Danach 6,99 €/Monat. Monatlich kündbar
Für 0,00 € ausprobieren
Weitere Angebote

Breaking the Spell

Von: Daniel C. Dennett
Gesprochen von: Dennis Holland
Für 0,00 € ausprobieren

Verlängert sich nach 30 Tagen für 6,99 €/Monat. Monatlich kündbar.

Für 21,04 € kaufen

Für 21,04 € kaufen

For all the thousands of books that have been written about religion, few until this one have attempted to examine it scientifically: to ask why - and how - it has shaped so many lives so strongly. Is religion a product of blind evolutionary instinct or rational choice? Is it truly the best way to live a moral life?

Ranging through biology, history, and psychology, Daniel C. Dennett charts religion’s evolution from “wild” folk belief to “domesticated” dogma. Not an antireligious creed but an unblinking look beneath the veil of orthodoxy, Breaking the Spell will be read and debated by believers and skeptics alike.

©2006 Daniel C. Dennett (P)2013 Audible, Inc. Religiöse Studien Sozialwissenschaften Wissenschaft

Diese Titel könnten dich auch interessieren

 On the Historicity of Jesus Titelbild
Supercommunicators Titelbild
A History of Fascism, 1914–1945 Titelbild
The God Delusion Titelbild
Elements of Jazz: From Cakewalks to Fusion Titelbild
From Bacteria to Bach and Back Titelbild
Not the Impossible Faith Titelbild
Elon Musk Titelbild
Sapiens Titelbild
Jesus Titelbild
Principles for Dealing with the Changing World Order Titelbild
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Titelbild
Why Zebras Don't Get Ulcers Titelbild
Habermas Titelbild
The Invention of the Jewish People Titelbild
The Selfish Gene Titelbild
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
Alle Sterne
Am relevantesten
If the arguments in favor and against religion were like both most distant points from equilibrium of the pendulum, Daniel Dennett's deserves the extreme position on the side of 'against religion'. As such it is an interesting book to understand the maximum position and its arguments. I personally did not feel too much sympathy for the phrases of the book and often felt the urge to return to more stable middle regions. For all his writing and sometimes convincing arguments about the limits of individual freedom, Daniel Dennett did not offer me any new insight in the debate and just reitterates many well known memes by Richard Dawkins and others. As a summary: if a book contains too often the sentence "as I already highlighted in a previous book", it is time for the author to stop writing and go into retirement. The reader can better go for the older books and understand them in their historical perspective.

Is religious adherence a human right?

Ein Fehler ist aufgetreten. Bitte versuche es in ein paar Minuten noch einmal.