During a Minnesota legislative hearing on age verification for adult websites, State Representative Leigh Finke argued that restricting minors’ access to pornography could harm “queer kids” because such sites function as sex education.

Yes — you heard that correctly.

As a father and a legislator, I find that claim deeply alarming.

Whatever your views on LGBTQ issues or sex education policy, one principle should unite every parent: pornography is not education, and children should not need access to it.

So why would a lawmaker oppose age verification for porn sites on the grounds that kids need them?

Let’s break down exactly what was said, what it means, and why this debate matters for families in Minnesota and beyond.

https://x.com/WalterHudson

⬇️ Watch, think critically, and decide for yourself.

🛠️ TOOLS I USE & RECOMMEND

🎬 Opus Pro – Automatically turn long-form videos into viral shorts
👉 https://www.opus.pro/?via=19c38e

🚗 TireGet.com – Tires delivered directly to your door
💸 Use promo code GRIT for savings
👉 https://www.tireget.com/

🔔 Stay Connected

If you value clear thinking, straight talk, and accountability from people in power, consider subscribing and sharing this podcast.

👍 Like
🔁 Share
🔔 Subscribe for more no-nonsense commentary

Support the show