Oral Argument Re-Listen: Case v. Montana | Case No. 24-624 | Oral Argument Date: 10/15/25 Titelbild

Oral Argument Re-Listen: Case v. Montana | Case No. 24-624 | Oral Argument Date: 10/15/25

Oral Argument Re-Listen: Case v. Montana | Case No. 24-624 | Oral Argument Date: 10/15/25

Jetzt kostenlos hören, ohne Abo

Details anzeigen

Über diesen Titel

Oral Argument Re-Listen: Case v. Montana | Case No. 24-624 | Oral Argument Date: 10/15/25

Link to Docket: Here

Case Preview: Here

Question Presented: Whether law enforcement may enter a home without a search warrant based on less than probable cause that an emergency is occurring, or whether the emergency-aid exception requires probable cause.

Oral Advocates:

  1. For Petitioner: Fred A. Rowley, Jr., Los Angeles
  2. For Respondent: Christian B. Corrigan, Solicitor General, Montana
  3. United States as Amicus Curiae: Zoe A. Jacoby, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice

Holding: Brigham City’s objective reasonableness standard for warrantless home entries to render emergency aid applies without further gloss and was satisfied in this case.

Result: Affirmed.

Voting Breakdown: 9-0. Justice Kagan delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Justices Sotomayor and Gorsuch filed concurring opinions.

Link to Opinion: Here.

Timestamps:

[00:00:00] Episode Preview

[00:00:50] Argument Begins

[00:01:02] Petitioner Opening Statement

[00:03:12] Petitioner Free for All Questions

[00:27:25] Petitioner Sequential Questions

[00:39:50] Respondent Opening Statement

[00:41:41] Respondent Free for All Questions

[00:55:44] Respondent Sequential Questions

[01:00:52] United States as Amicus Curaie Opening Statement

[01:02:01] United States as Amicus Curaie Free for All Questions

[01:09:15] United States as Amicus Curaie Sequential Questions

[01:10:40] Petitioner Rebuttal

Noch keine Rezensionen vorhanden