Oral Argument Re-Listen: Case v. Montana | Case No. 24-624 | Oral Argument Date: 10/15/25
Artikel konnten nicht hinzugefügt werden
Der Titel konnte nicht zum Warenkorb hinzugefügt werden.
Der Titel konnte nicht zum Merkzettel hinzugefügt werden.
„Von Wunschzettel entfernen“ fehlgeschlagen.
„Podcast folgen“ fehlgeschlagen
„Podcast nicht mehr folgen“ fehlgeschlagen
-
Gesprochen von:
-
Von:
Über diesen Titel
Oral Argument Re-Listen: Case v. Montana | Case No. 24-624 | Oral Argument Date: 10/15/25
Link to Docket: Here
Case Preview: Here
Question Presented: Whether law enforcement may enter a home without a search warrant based on less than probable cause that an emergency is occurring, or whether the emergency-aid exception requires probable cause.
Oral Advocates:
- For Petitioner: Fred A. Rowley, Jr., Los Angeles
- For Respondent: Christian B. Corrigan, Solicitor General, Montana
- United States as Amicus Curiae: Zoe A. Jacoby, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice
Holding: Brigham City’s objective reasonableness standard for warrantless home entries to render emergency aid applies without further gloss and was satisfied in this case.
Result: Affirmed.
Voting Breakdown: 9-0. Justice Kagan delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Justices Sotomayor and Gorsuch filed concurring opinions.
Link to Opinion: Here.
Timestamps:
[00:00:00] Episode Preview
[00:00:50] Argument Begins
[00:01:02] Petitioner Opening Statement
[00:03:12] Petitioner Free for All Questions
[00:27:25] Petitioner Sequential Questions
[00:39:50] Respondent Opening Statement
[00:41:41] Respondent Free for All Questions
[00:55:44] Respondent Sequential Questions
[01:00:52] United States as Amicus Curaie Opening Statement
[01:02:01] United States as Amicus Curaie Free for All Questions
[01:09:15] United States as Amicus Curaie Sequential Questions
[01:10:40] Petitioner Rebuttal
