Why Question 2 Matters to My Marriage
Nie udało się dodać produktów
Nie udało się dodać tytułu do koszyka.
Nie udało się dodać tytułu do schowka.
„Usuń ze schowka“ nie powiodło się.
„Obserwuj podcast“ nie powiodło się
„Przestań obserwować podcast“ nie powiodło się
-
Czyta:
-
Autor:
Why does Virginia’s Question 2 matter to my marriage?
My wife Lauri and I voted “yes” on Question 2, the proposed amendment to the Virginia Constitution that would remove the state’s existing constitutional ban on same-sex marriage and require Virginia to recognize and treat all legally valid marriages equally, regardless of sex, gender, or race.
Same-sex marriage is currently protected by the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges decision. But Virginia’s Constitution still contains the language adopted in 2006 that says only a union between a man and a woman may be recognized as a marriage.
I don't know what would happen to existing same-sex marriages if Obergefell were ever overturned. That's precisely why I think removing that language from Virginia's Constitution matters.
And Question 2 isn't only about same-sex marriage. It would also protect marriage regardless of race, bringing to mind Virginia's history with Loving v. Virginia.
If you live in Virginia, Question 2 is on the 2026 ballot. Here's why it matters to me—and to my marriage.
You can find the transcript at https://spectrumpodcast.org/2026/09/30/why-question-2-matters-to-my-marriage/
00:00 Early Voting Has Begun
00:22 What Is Question 2?
00:49 Why Question 2 Matters to My Marriage
01:03 The Risk If Obergefell Is Overturned
01:55 Why That Risk Isn't Hypothetical
02:22 Explicitly Protecting Our Marriages
02:29 Question 2 Protects More Than Same-Sex Marriage
02:37 Loving v. Virginia and Marriage Equality
03:05 What Question 2 Would Protect
03:14 Why I'm Asking You to Vote Yes
03:28 The American Ideal Behind Question 2