Productivity Pulse Episode 10
Nie udało się dodać produktów
Nie udało się dodać tytułu do koszyka.
Nie udało się dodać tytułu do schowka.
„Usuń ze schowka“ nie powiodło się.
„Obserwuj podcast“ nie powiodło się
„Przestań obserwować podcast“ nie powiodło się
-
Czyta:
-
Autor:
Send us Fan Mail
Why do operational bottlenecks persist even when you have access to performance data? In this episode of The Productivity Pulse, James, Sue, and Simon discuss how qualitative research bridges the gap between knowing what your workforce is doing and understanding why they do it.
The team shares real-world case studies from recent client projects—ranging from store managers stuck resolving minor issues to HR teams battling mismatched software systems.
In this episode, you’ll discover:
- What vs. Why: The distinction between observational role studies and deep-dive qualitative interviews.
- The "Sock Drawer" Effect: Why disorganized systems waste energy and how employees describe their operational friction.
- Managerial Coaching Dynamics: How identifying "learned dependence" in underperforming stores creates clear pathways for sales growth.
- The Power of Anonymity: How structured, active-listening interviews give staff the confidence to share authentic, actionable insights.
Resources: To learn more about our qualitative research services, visit our website ReSearch or connect with the team on LinkedIn.
#theproductivityexperts
Download a copy of the ReThink Productivity Retail Report
Connect to Simon on LinkedIn
Follow ReThink on LinkedIn