What topics are not talked about enough in Computer Science? Over the last 10 episodes, this podcast has identified quite some issues that deserve more attention. In today's bonus episode, we look back at season 1 and reflect on some recurring themes, such as the goals of programming, the value of vagueness, the notion of dominance and control, and, of course, issues around AI, AI, and more AI. Hanna requests Wittgenstein for season two, and Felienne brings a list of books and articles she'd like to read that could fill at least two more seasons. So yes, we will be back!

Links:

• Our Discord channel for the pod: https://discord.com/invite/Vt2Pcc44m6
• Felienne’s write-up: https://www.felienne.nl/csoc-s01e11/
• Hanna’s homework: https://homework.unedited.me/

Mentions and references:

• Episode 1: Naur, P. (1985). Programming as theory building. Microprocessing and microprogramming, 15(5), 253-261.
• Episode 2: Laurel, B. (2014). Computers as Theatre. Addison-Wesley.
• Episode 3: Turing, A. M. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 59(236), 433–460.
• Episode 4: Dreyfus, H. L. (1992). What computers still can't do: A critique of artificial reason. MIT Press.
• Episode 5: Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge University Press.
• Episode 6: Weizenbaum, J. (1976). Computer power and human reason: From judgment to calculation. W. H. Freeman & Company.
• Episode 7: Turkle, S. (2005). The Second Self: Computers and the Human Spirit. The MIT Press.
• Episode 8: Mueller, G. (2021). Breaking things at work: The Luddites are right about why you hate your job. Verso Books.
• Episode 9: Daston, L., & Galison, P. L. (2021). Objectivity. Princeton University Press.
• Episode 10: Winner, L. (1980). Do Artifacts Have Politics? Daedalus, 109(1), 121–136. The MIT Press on behalf of American Academy of Arts & Sciences.

Audio and music credits:

• Song: “Curiosity Rag” (1910) by James E.C. Kelly (public domain)
• Sound effects and background sounds: Public domain/CC0 sounds from Freesound.org and self-recorded page-turning sounds
• Audio editing: Hanna at Earpolish.com

Does software have politics? Are LLMs like power plants? Do ships need captains? In this final episode of our first season, we discuss these questions and take a look at Langdon Winner's paper "Do Artifacts Have Politics?" (1980). Spoiler alert: the answer to the question in this paper's title is a big, bold YES! According to Winner, there are two ways in which artifacts can have political properties. In our episode, we illustrate these with examples and apply Winner's observations to current technologies such as LLMs. We explore how the political properties of software can be accounted for in Computer Science education and establish links to prior episodes. As always, Felienne considers new tattoos, and Hanna finally does the homework she's been assigned.

Links:

• Our Discord channel for the pod: https://discord.com/invite/Vt2Pcc44m6
• Felienne’s blog post: https://www.felienne.nl/csoc-s01e10/
• Hanna’s homework: https://homework.unedited.me/posts/csoc-s01e10-homework/

Mentions and references:

• Winner, L. (1980). Do Artifacts Have Politics? Daedalus, 109(1), 121–136. Published by: The MIT Press on behalf of American Academy of Arts & Sciences. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20024652.
• Article on Robert Moses' Southern State Parkway's bridges: Campanella, T. J. (2017, July 9). Robert Moses and his racist Parkway, explained. Bloomberg.com. URL: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-07-09/robert-moses-and-his-racist-parkway-explained
• Winner's quote about the inevitable link between nuclear power and a techno-scientific industrial-military elite comes from: Mander, J. (1977). Four arguments for the elimination of television. William Morrow & Co.
• Jansen, F., Schraffenberger, H., & Jacobs, B. (2026, April). Decidos: Accessible, Usable and Secure Voting in Low-stakes Elections Using Identity Wallets. In Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-8).
• Kaltenbrunner, M., Jorda, S., Geiger, G., & Alonso, M. (2006, June). The reacTable*: A collaborative musical instrument. In 15th IEEE International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WETICE'06) (pp. 406-411). IEEE.
• Wall of Sound (2008). Student project at Stuttgart Media University (HdM). Team: Steffel Abel, Tobias Adam, Simon Brenner, Andreas Jäger, Christian Schilling and Hanna Schraffenberger. See: https://vimeo.com/2477598

Audio and music credits:

• Song: “Curiosity Rag” (1910) by James E.C. Kelly (public domain)
• Sound effects and background sounds: Public domain/CC0 sounds from Freesound.org and self-recorded page-turning sounds
• Audio editing: Hanna at Earpolish.com

Imagine you're a scientist. What is it you are seeking: objectivity or truth? In this episode of Computer Science Off Course, we reflect on the aims of science in general and Computer Science in particular. We discuss the notion of objectivity and the role of emotion and fear in research. We take a look at Lorraine Daston and Peter Galison's book "Objectivity" (2021) and walk you through the three periods in the history of objectivity. Also, there is talk about the shape of splashes and the beauty of flowers. Felienne has plans for one or two new tattoos, and Hanna refuses to choose between objectivity and truth! Whether you are a scientist or not, if you are interested in knowledge, this episode is for you.

Mentions and references:

• Daston, L., & Galison, P. L. (2021). Objectivity. Princeton University Press.
• We have a discord, please join: https://discord.com/invite/Vt2Pcc44m6
• Feynman, R. (1981). The beauty of a flower [Video]. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p018w2zl. Also available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbFM3rn4ldo
• van Duijn, M. J. (2016). The lazy mindreader: A humanities perspective on mindreading and multiple-order intentionality (Doctoral dissertation, Leiden University).
• Naur, P. (1985). Programming as theory building. Microprocessing and microprogramming, 15(5), 253-261.
• Shownotes have a character limit. For more references, please have a look at the homework

Links:

• Felienne’s blog post: https://www.felienne.nl/csoc-s01e09/
• Hanna’s homework: https://homework.unedited.me/posts/csoc-s01e09-homework/

Audio and music credits:

• Song: “Curiosity Rag” (1910) by James E.C. Kelly (public domain)
• Sound effects and background sounds: Public domain/CC0 sounds from Freesound.org and self-recorded page-turning sounds
• Audio editing: Hanna at Earpolish.com