👉 Get the free episode companion guide here

Are you team ChatGPT, team Claude, or happily on neither side? As of October 2026, I've landed firmly on Claude when it comes to Claude vs ChatGPT for private practice, and I walk you through why, including how each platform handles privacy and data retention, which is a big part of whether Claude is safe for therapists compared with the alternatives. If you're writing work cover reports, TAC reports, medico legal letters, funding letters or tenders, Claude wins for me every time because of its larger context window and its tendency to hallucinate a little less, while ChatGPT is where I go when I need an image for a freebie. We also talk about the two things that happen behind the scenes with AI that most of us never hear about, which are AI hallucinations (confident, invented facts, including references that look completely legitimate) and AI drift (when a helpful suggestion leads you down a rabbit hole and your to-do list is still untouched at the end of the day). I share the hard way I learned to check sources while preparing journal articles, plus what happened to Deloitte when fabricated content ended up in front of a court. From there we get into why treating your AI like a best friend can soften your judgement, and how using AI as a thinking partner, where you write the first draft yourself and ask it questions to sharpen your own work, keeps your voice and your credibility intact. This one is for AI for counsellors and psychologists who want to use these tools well, and if you'd like support with AI report writing, team training or AI consulting for private practice, you can find me at brooklynstorme.com or join Claude for Therapists, where the first week is free and it's $7 after that. Take the experiment I suggest and run the same task on both platforms, because your own results will teach you more than my opinion ever could.

Keywords used: Claude vs ChatGPT for private practice, AI for therapists in Australia, AI hallucinations, AI drift, is Claude safe for therapists, AI privacy and data retention, using AI as a thinking partner, AI for counsellors and psychologists, AI report writing, AI consulting for private practice

Mini FAQ:

Q: Is Claude or ChatGPT better for private practice? A: For documentation like work cover, TAC and medico legal reports, I find Claude better because of its larger context window and its tendency to hallucinate a little less. ChatGPT is stronger for image creation, so many people end up using both.

Q: What is an AI hallucination? A: It's when AI invents or falsifies information, including references, and presents it with so much confidence that you accept it without questioning. Asking for clickable sources and checking each one yourself is the best protection.

Q: What is AI drift? A: Drift is when a stream of follow-up suggestions pulls you away from your original task, so you lose time in a rabbit hole and the thing you sat down to do stays unfinished.

Q: How can therapists use AI as a thinking partner? A: Write the piece yourself first, then bring it to Claude and ask what you missed, where the gaps are and whether your metaphors work. You make the edits in your own words, which keeps your voice and your authority intact.

Q: Is Claude safer than ChatGPT for privacy? A: Claude has historically had data sharing and retention settings switched off by default, whereas ChatGPT worked the opposite way, which is why I currently see Claude as the safer option for private practice. Platforms change quickly, so it's worth checking the settings yourself.