Recorded May 3, 2022, after the Supreme Court draft leaked.

I’ve grown a lot since then, and I have a lot more information and knowledge about this subject than I did that day. I still stand behind what I was getting at, but there are plenty of places I would clean up, explain further, or say completely differently now.

I thought about leaving this one in the archive. Instead, I’m posting it unedited as part of that growth. These were my first thoughts, and I wanted to get them out of my head. Here are a few things I want to make clearer:

• ​ Roe v. Wade was still in effect when I recorded this. The leak was a draft, not a ruling. Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization overturned Roe and Planned Parenthood v. Casey on June 24, 2022.
• ​ My personal beliefs about rights and responsibility are not the same thing as explaining what the law recognizes. When I say abortion “is not your right,” that needs this distinction. At the time, Roe and Casey recognized a qualified federal constitutional right to abortion. Dobbs later rejected that federal constitutional protection; it did not declare that abortion rights could not be protected under state law.
• ​ I favor decisions being closer to the people affected by them. But giving states more say doesn’t automatically mean less government control, and state governments can overreach too. Roe and Casey limited government interference. Removing those limits allowed greater restrictions.
• ​ I believe that knowingly participating in something that can create life carries responsibility… for fathers too. That is my moral argument. Knowing pregnancy is possible is not, by itself, a legal waiver of a right to abortion.
• ​ Saying someone can go somewhere else makes it sound simpler than it may be. Money, travel, work, health, and family responsibilities matter. And when I say I don’t know your circumstances… I mean that.
• ​ Near the end, I wonder what this could mean for other decisions about our bodies. Roe and Casey were court decisions, not a blanket “my body, my choice” law. The Dobbs majority said its decision concerned abortion and should not cast doubt on precedents unrelated to abortion. Other opinions raised concerns about the broader implications. Those distinctions matter.

I’ve included the sources below so you can read them for yourself, including the reasoning people on the Court disagreed about. They explain the legal history. My personal convictions are mine to explain and stand behind.

Supreme Court statement confirming the draft, May 3, 2022: Read the statement

Roe v. Wade (1973), the original decision:

Read Roe

Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992), reaffirming Roe’s central protection and addressing limits on state interference: Read Casey

Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (2022), including the majority, concurring, and dissenting opinions: Read Dobbs

Love you. Be good.